期刊文献+

言外转喻属性强加联想模式构建的感受质解读 被引量:3

The Qualia Construal of Attribute Enforcement-association Model Attached to Illocutionary Metonymy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Panther提出言外转喻是自然的推理模式之一,其假设为间接言语行为指向其属性。邹春玲在此基础上,修正、完善原属性模式解释力和微观操作不明等不足,提出"属性加强联想"模式。本文旨在为该模式的确立添砖加瓦,从感受质角度论证"属性强加联想"模式的合理性和有效性。 Panther proposes that illocutionary metonymy is one of a set of natural pragmatic reasoning models, and the basic idea is that an attribute of a speech act can stand for the speech act itself. Zou Chun-ling improves and modifies the explicability of this hy- pothesis by clarifying its micro-reasoning operation procedures, and she proposes her "Attribute Enforcement-association" reaso- ning model, in which a highly-specific and constrained attribute inferential model is based upon the amended version of the origi- nal IM and blending theory. This paper further expounds and proves the rationality and efficiency of the model proposed by stan- dard of "qualia".
作者 孙振偎
机构地区 哈尔滨理工大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期35-39,共5页 Foreign Language Research
基金 黑龙江省高校人文社科研究项目"言外转喻的加强联想模型构建"(12522045)的阶段性成果
关键词 属性强加联想模式 言外转喻 感受质 Attribute Enforcement-association illocutionary metonymy qualia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献81

  • 1刘丹青.汉语类指成分的语义属性和句法属性[J].中国语文,2002(5):411-422. 被引量:246
  • 2于根元.说“全都……只有……”[J].汉语学习,1982(2):1-6. 被引量:9
  • 3周北海.概称句本质与概念[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,41(4):20-29. 被引量:46
  • 4Adorno,T. 1973. Negative Dialectics [M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • 5Asher, N. & M. Morreau. 1991. Commonsense entailment: A modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning [A]. In J. van Eijck (ed.). Logics in AI [C]. Berlin: Springer. 1-30.
  • 6Carlson, G. 1989. On the semantic composition of English generic sentences[A]. In G. Chierchia, B. Partee&R. Turner (eds.). Properties, Types and Meaning: Semantic Issues [C]. Berlin: Springer. 167-192.
  • 7Chihara, C. 1979. The semantic paradoxes: A diagnostic investigation[J]. The Philosophical Review 88:590-618.
  • 8Chung, K. 2002. Book review of Think Generic ! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences [J]. Language 78: 203.
  • 9Cohen, A. 1999. Think Generic! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Eckardt, R. 1999. Normal objects, normal worlds and the meaning of generic sentences[J]. Journal of Semantics16: 237-278.

共引文献214

同被引文献21

  • 1Damasio, A. Descartes" Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain[M]. New York: Putnam, 1994.
  • 2Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
  • 3Pilkington, A. Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000.
  • 4Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. Loose Talk[A]. In P. Hanks & R. Giora (eds.) Metaphor and Figurative Language [C]. London: Routledge, 2012b. 323-337.
  • 5Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. Meaning and Relevance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012a.
  • 6Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
  • 7Tendahl, G. & W. Gibbs. Complementary Perspectives on Metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, (11): 1823-1864.
  • 8冉永平.词汇语用探索[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2012.
  • 9范振强.《隐喻中的语境和连接》介评[J].现代外语,2009,32(2):205-207. 被引量:4
  • 10江玲.关联理论的隐喻观[J].长春师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,28(4):134-139. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部