期刊文献+

逻辑转喻的认知机制探析 被引量:2

Exploring the Cognitive Mechanism of Logical Metonymy
原文传递
导出
摘要 逻辑转喻因其句法结构和语义理解的不一致性吸引了学者们的关注。本文基于语言的使用观和认知观,探讨逻辑转喻的认知属性及其认知机制。逻辑转喻本质上是认知的,是概念转喻与句法结构相互作用的结果。以心理上的完形和激活机制为基础,逻辑转喻可以理解为充当论元的实体名词作为事件框架中的一部分激活整个事件框架,这为逻辑转喻的意义理解提供心理可及。 Logical metonymy has attracted linguists' attention due to the non-correspondence between syntactic structure and its seman- tic interpretations. Following the principle that language is usage-based, this article explores the nature and the mechanism of logical metonymy. Based on the motivation from psychology, it is argued that logical metonymy results from both cognitive mecha- nism and linguistic system. The entity noun as an argument in logical metonymy activates a whole event frame in which the noun is involved. This activation process provides mental access for the semantic interpretation of logical metonymy.
作者 高翠雨
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期40-44,共5页 Foreign Language Research
基金 国家社科基金项目"意义进化视角的英汉语法隐喻研究"(12BYY008) 教育部人文社科青年项目"英语教学视阈下语法隐喻思维能力的实证研究"(11YJC740083) 辽宁省社科规划基金项目"逻辑转喻的认知语义研究"(L11DYY052)的阶段性成果
关键词 逻辑转喻 心理现实性 认知机制 心理可及 logical metonymy psychological reality cognitive mechanism mental access
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Anderson, R. A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory [ J ]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983 (3).
  • 2Baggio, G., Lambalgen, M. & Hagoort, P. The Processing Consequences of Compositionality [ A ]. In Werning, M., Hinzen, W. & Machery, E. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality [ C ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • 3Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. A Spreading-activation Theory of Semantic Processing[ J]. Psychological Review, 1975 (6).
  • 4Copestake, A. & Briscoe, E. J. Semi-productive Polysemy and Sense Extension [ J]. Journal of Semantics, 1995 (1).
  • 5Curse, D. A. Lexical Semantics [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  • 6Evans, V. & Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics: An lntroduc-tion [ M ]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
  • 7Jackendoff, R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty [ M ]. Cambridge : MIT Press, 1997.
  • 8Langacker, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar ( Volume I) [ M ]. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 9Langacker,R. W. Reference-point Constructions [ J ]. Cogni- tive Linguistics, 1993 ( 1 ).
  • 10Ronald W.Langacker.Metonymy in Grammar[J].外国语,2004,27(6):2-24. 被引量:46

二级参考文献36

  • 1Barlow, Michael. A Situated Theory of Agreement [M]. New York: Garland, 1992.
  • 2Chafe, Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 3Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces." Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford, 1985.
  • 4Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 5Gensler, Orin D. Non-Syntactic Antecedents and Frame Semantics[A]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society[Z]. 1977, 3:321-334.
  • 6Haiman, John. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias [J]. Lingua, 1980, 50: 329-357.
  • 7Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 7: 391-428.
  • 8Kovecses, Zoltan, and Gtinter Radden. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9: 33-77.
  • 9Kumashiro, Toshiyuki, and Ronald W. Langacker. Double-Subject and Complex-Predicate Constructions [J].Cognitive Linguistics, 2003,14:1-45.
  • 10Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

共引文献52

同被引文献38

  • 1舒启全.貌似神合 维妙维肖——评张振玉译《京华烟云》[J].中国翻译,1989(2):42-47. 被引量:7
  • 2王斌.映射及其认知运作[J].外语研究,2001,18(3):36-40. 被引量:19
  • 3武瑷华.谈隐喻化[J].中国俄语教学,2001,20(1):25-32. 被引量:5
  • 4高航,严辰松.英语空间图式“Front-Back”的隐喻性扩展[J].四川外语学院学报,2006,22(6):71-76. 被引量:7
  • 5Fauconnier, G. ~ M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think : Conceptual Blending and the Mind ~ s Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
  • 6Croft, W. ~ D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M ]. Cambridge.. Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Ungerer, F. ~ H. J. Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. London: Longmaru.
  • 8Баранов. А. Н 2003. О типах сочетаемости метафорических моделей [J]. Вопросы Ягыкоэнания (2): 73-94.
  • 9Никонова. М. Н 2008. Соременный Русский Язык [М]. Омск: ОмГГУ.
  • 10Пенсина- С. А. 2005. Полисемия в Когнитивном Аспекте [М]. СПБ. : РПIY им. А. И Герцена.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部