期刊文献+

基于DRT的2D-RS语义模型研究

Modeling Approach to a DRT-Based 2D-RS Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以Kamp为代表的话语表征理论(DRT)在模型论语义学的基础上,将话语表征结构(DRS)引入语义模型中来,动态地解释E-类代词回指等长期困扰传统形式语义学家的话语回指问题。然而,我们的研究表明,当前的DRT模型还无法对无显性先行语的深层回指作出有效的解释。究其原因,我们认为,与自然语的层次丰富、内容多样的实际特征相比,DRT仅以单一层次的DRS作为话语解读的语境,这无论在思想上还是技术上都过于简单。因此,本文提出了一种基于DRS和KRS(知识表征结构)的二维话语表征语义模型(2D-RS Model),旨在探索更有效的回指消解途径,以期在DRT理论的框架下解决更多的回指问题,进而使DRT在话语回指消解方面的应用更具普遍性。 Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) proposed by Hans Kamp overcomes the fatal weakness encountered in the static se- mantics by introducing originally a discourse representation structure (DRS) as a new level of presentation into the model-theore- tic semantics. At this level, the anaphora types such as referential anaphora, bound-variables, and E-type anaphora are resolved effectively. Nonetheless, further research indicates that the current DRT fails to give an effective interpretation to those types of a- naphora without explicit linguistic antecedents. The results of this study show that the DRS ought to fulfill a dual function, as a mental model of the discourse on the one hand and as a mental model of the world on the other. DRT model is obviously an over- simplieation in both theory and practice comparing with the complexity inherited from natural language and thus a major revision of DRT is called for. In view of the above, the present research sets about extending the original DRT to a Two-Dimensional Dis- course Representation Structure Model (2D-RS) to give the mental model of the world in DRT a due diligence.
作者 张旭红
机构地区 哈尔滨师范大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期50-57,共8页 Foreign Language Research
基金 国家社科基金资助项目"深层回指的语篇表述理论消解失效问题及其解决研究"(11BYY113)阶段性成果
关键词 深层回指 知识表征结构 常规关系 溯因推理 2D—RS模型 deep anaphora KRS stereotypical relation abductive reasoning 2D-RS Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Dell, G., et al. The Activation of Antecedent Information during the Processing of Anaphoric Reference in Reading [ J ]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983 (22).
  • 2Fodor, J. A. The Language of Thought [ M ]. New York : Crowell, 1975.
  • 3Fodor, J. A. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
  • 4Garrod, S. & A. J. Sanford. Resolving Sentences in a Dis- course Context: How Discourse Representation Affects Language Understanding [ A ]. In M. Gemsbacher ( ed. ). Handbook of Psycholinguistics [ C ]. New York: Academic Press, 1994.
  • 5Gemsbacher, M. Mechanisms that Improve Referential Ac- cess[J]. Cognition, 1989(32).
  • 6Haviland, S. E. & H. H. Clark. What's New? Acquiring New Information as a Process in Comprehension [ J ]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974 (13).
  • 7Hobbs, J. R. Implicature and Definite Reference [ M ]. Stan- ford: Report No. CSLI. , 1987.
  • 8Huang, Y. Anaphora : A Cross-Linguistic Study[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 9Kamp, H. & U. Reyle. From Discourse to Logic: Introduc- tion to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory [ M ]. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Press, 1993.
  • 10Kamp, H. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation [ A ]. In Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. (eds.). For- mal Methods in the Study of Language: Part 1 [ C ]. Amsterdam : Mathematisch Centrum, 1981.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部