期刊文献+

汉语级差词项“一些”的语义-语用解读 被引量:2

The Semantic-Pragmatic Interpretations of the Chinese Scalar Item“Yixie”
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来一些研究者发现,某些引发级差含义的级差词项的语义内容与Horn的经典论述不尽相同并提出质疑。本文采用心理学实验的方法探究汉语级差词项"一些"的语义内容,尝试以此为出发点重新审视级差含义的性质,进一步探究语义和语用之间的关系。实验结果表明,汉语数量词"一些"的语义内容表示不确定数量,可以包含上限"全部"。这一结果与Horn的解释相一致,但汉语"一些"的核心意义仅仅表达全部数量中较小的部分,而"全部"处于语义的上限边缘位置,引发级差含义的产生。同时,"一些"的语义内容与其级差含义之间的关系表明,话语的语义内容与语用扩充意义之间无清晰分界,是一个连续统一体。 Recent studies have revealed that the semantic content of some scalar items is not the same as Horn' s original proposal, which therefore leads to some issues to be addressed. This paper aims to identify the semantic content of Chinese scalar item "yixie" through conducting a psychological experiment, which is designed to re-examine the nature of scalar implicatures with re- gard to the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. Our primary results suggest that the semantic content of the Chinese quantifier "yixie" denotes indefinite quantity, and may include, to some extent, the upper bound "all". This result is well con- sistent with Horn's explanation. However, the core meaning of "yixie" denotes smaller proportional quantity, with its upper bound "all" being peripheral where scalar implicature tends to be generated. The result also indicates that the semantic content of an utterance and its enrichment present a continuum without a clear borderline.
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期63-68,共6页 Foreign Language Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"双语者语言产生的词汇选择机制及其调节机制"(31170970)的阶段性成果
关键词 级差词项 语义内容 级差含义 语义-语用界面 scalar item semantic content scalar implicature semantics-pragmatics interface
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1黄振荣蒋严.贝叶斯概率模型及其在语用学上的应用[A].蒋严.走近形式语用学[c].上海:上海教育出版社,2011.
  • 2张绍杰.一般会话含义的“两面性”与含义推导模式问题[J].外语教学与研究,2008,40(3):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3Ariel, M. A 'Just That' Lexical Meaning for Most [A]. In K. Turner & K. Von Heusinger (eds.). Where Seman- tics Meets Pragmatics [ C ]. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2006.
  • 4Bezuidenhout, A. & Cutting, C. Literal Meaning, Minimal Propositions, and Pragmatic Processing[ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002 (4).
  • 5Breheny, R. A New Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Numerically Quantified Noun Phrases [ J ]. Journal of Semantics, 2008 (2).
  • 6Carston, R. Informativeness, Relevance, and Scalar Implica- ture [ A]. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.). Rele- vance Theory: Applications and Implications [ C ]. Am- sterdam : John Benjamins, 1998.
  • 7Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances : The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwell, 2002.
  • 8Carston, R. Explicit Communication and 'free' Pragmatic Enrichment [ A ]. In B. Soria & E. Romero ( eds. ). Explicit Communication : Robyn Carston' s Pragmatics [ C ]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • 9Chemla, E. & Spector, B. Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures [ J ]. Journal of Semantics, 2011 (3).
  • 10Chierchia, G. Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface [ A ]. In A. Belletti ( ed. ). Structures and Beyond[ C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

二级参考文献2

共引文献39

同被引文献34

  • 1Bott, L.&I. Noveck. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2004, (51): 437-457.
  • 2Breheny, R., N. Katsos&J.illiams. Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences[J]. Cognition, 2006, (100) : 434 - 463.
  • 3Breheny, R., N. Katsos&J. i 11 Jams. Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default?An on- line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences[J].Cognition, 2006, (100) : 434 - 463.
  • 4Carston, R. Quantity maxims and generalized implicature[J]. Lingua, 1995, (96): 213-244.
  • 5Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication[M].Oxford: Blackwelt, 2002.
  • 6Chierchia G, S. Crain, M.T. Guasti, A. Gualmini&L. Meroni. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures[J].In A.H-J. Do, L. Domingues&A. Johansen (eds.).Proceeding of the 25th Boston University conference on language development[D].Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 2001: 157 - 168.
  • 7Chierchia, 6. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface[J].Structures and Beyond, 2004, (3): 39-103.
  • 8Chierchia, G., T. Guasti, A. Gualmini, L.Meroni, S. Crain&F. Foppolo. Semantic and Pragmatic Competence in Children' s and Adults' Comprehension of or. [h]In: I. NoveckD. Sperber (eds.) Experimental Pragmaties[C].aampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005: 293- 300.
  • 9Feeney, A., S. Scrafton, A. DuckworthS. J. Handley. The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults[J] Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2004, (2) : 121 - 132.
  • 10Foppolo, F. Between "cost" and "default" of scalar implicature: the cost of embedding[J].In G., Atle (ed.) .Proceedings of SUB. 2008, (12): 137-150, Oslo: ILOS.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部