期刊文献+

两种猪肺炎支原体原位杂交检测方法的应用

Comparative study on two in situ hybridization methods of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了比较研究3种猪肺炎支原体(Mhp)的检测方法,利用已建立的显色原位杂交(CISH)和量子点荧光原位杂交(QD-FISH),并结合PCR方法,检测人工感染Mhp的试验猪、自然感染Mhp的试验猪和疑似感染Mhp的临床样品。结果显示,3种检测方法对人工感染组和自然感染组的检测率均为100%;对临床样品,PCR的检测率为90%,CISH的检测率为70%,QD-FISH的检测率为75%。结果表明,用于检测Mhp感染,PCR是最佳检测方法,但CISH和QD-FISH在Mhp检测和致病机理研究方面具有一定的应用价值。 The present study was designed to compare three methods for detecting Mycoplasrna hyopneumoniae (Mhp). PCR, chromogenic in situ hybridization(CISH) and Quantum dots fluorescent in situ hybridization(QD-FISH) ,were used to detect lung tissue samples collected from experimentally infected pigs, naturally infected pigs and suspected infected pigs. The results showed that the CISH and QD-FISH experiment results of artificial infection group and natural infection group were consistent with the results of PCR method. The detection rate of PCR, CISH and QD-FISH for clinical samples were 90%, 70% and 75 %, respectively. Thus, it could be concluded that CISH and QD-FISH had a certain value in the detection and pathogenesis research of Mhp,while PCR was the best method for detecting Mhp.
出处 《中国兽医杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第11期6-8,I0001,共4页 Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine
基金 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2011680) 江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX(11)2037)
关键词 猪肺炎支原体 PCR 显色原位杂交 量子点荧光原位杂交 Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae PCR chromogenic in situ hybridization quantum dots flu-orescent in situ hybridization
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Goodwin R F, Whittlestone P. Production of enzootic pneumonia in pigs with an agent grown in tissue culture from the natural disease[J]. Br J Exp Pathol, 1963,44 : 291-299.
  • 2Thacker E L. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae[J]. J Swine Health Prod, 2004, 12(5) :252-254.
  • 3Kwon D, Chae C. Detection and localization of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae DNA in lungs from naturally infected pigs hy in situ hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled probe[J]. Vet Pathol, 1999,36(4) :308-313.
  • 4Kwon D, Choi C, Chae C. Chronologic localization of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in experimentally infected pigs[J]. Vet Pathol, 2002,39(5) :584-587.
  • 5Boye M, Jensen T K, Ahrens P,et al. in situ hybridisation for identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyosynoviae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis in formalin-fixed porcine tissue sections[J]. APMIS, 2001, 109 (10) :656-664.
  • 6Jiang Z, Li R, Todd N W, et al. Detecting genomic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization with quantum dotslabeled probes [ J]. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2007, 7 (12) : 4254-4259.
  • 7Chen H L, Peng J, Zhu X B, etal. Detection of EBV in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by quantum dot fluorescent in situ hybridization[J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2010,89(3):367-371.
  • 8Artiushin S, Stipkovits L, Minion F C. Development of polymerase chain reaction primers to detect Mycoptasrna hyopneumoniae[J]. Mol Cell Probes, 1993,7(5):381-385.
  • 9SФrensen V, Ahrens P, Barfod K, et al. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs: duration of the disease and evaluation of four diagnostic assays[J]. Vet Microbiol, 1997,54 (1) :23-34.
  • 10王占伟,熊褀琰,刘茂军,冯志新,白方方,邵国青.猪肺炎支原体显色原位杂交研究方法的建立[J].中国预防兽医学报,2012,34(3):214-218. 被引量:6

二级参考文献1

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部