期刊文献+

心理干预对飞行人员应对方式和社会支持的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Psychological Intervention on Coping Style and Social Support of Aircrew
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨心理干预对飞行人员应对方式和社会支持的影响。方法选取来院疗养的119名军事飞行人员,随机分为干预组和对照组,对干预组实施心理干预,对照组不进行任何心理干预,采用社会支持量表及应对方式问卷对心理干预前后两组飞行人员进行测评,并对干预前后的结果进行比较。结果①心理干预前两组飞行人员应对方式和社会支持量表得分无统计学差异(t=0.12,0.74,-0.30,0.67,-0.37,-0.67;P>0.05);②心理干预后干预组飞行人员的积极应对维度(t=2.67,P<0.01)、主观支持度(t=2.85,P<0.01)、对支持利用度的得分(t=2.45,P<0.05)及社会支持总分(t=2.82,P<0.01)高于干预前,消极应对维度得分低于干预前(t=4.11,P<0.01),对照组前后测的各量表得分无显著变化;③干预组心理干预后飞行人员的积极应对维度(t=2.45,P<0.05)、主观支持度(t=2.90,P<0.01)、对支持利用度得分(t=2.61,P<0.01)及社会支持总分(t=3.42,P<0.01)均高于同时期的对照组,消极应对维度得分低于对照组(t=-2.72,P<0.01)。结论心理干预能改善飞行人员的应对方式,提高飞行人员的社会支持水平。 Objectives To study the effect of psychological intervention on coping style and social support of aircrew.Methods A total of 119 military aircrew were randomly divided into intervention group and control group.The psychological intervention was performed on intervention group,and no psychological intervention was performed on control group.Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS)and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire(TCSQ) were used to observe the effect of psychological intervention on the aircrew.Results ①There were no significant differences between two groups in SSRS and TCSQ before psychological intervention(t=0.12,0.74,-0.30,0.67,-0.37,-0.67;P0.05).②After intervention,the scores of positive coping styles(t=2.67,P0.01),subjective support(t=2.85,P0.01),utilization ratio of support(t=2.45,P0.05)and total scale of social support(t=2.82,P0.01)were significantly higher than those before intervention,and the score of negative coping styles was significantly lower than that before intervention(t=4.11,P0.01).there were no significant differences between pretest and posttest in control group score(t=0.32,-0.57,0.22,0.66,0.34,1.27;P0.05).③After intervention,the scores of positive coping styles(t=2.45,P0.05),subjective support(t=2.90,P0.01),utilization ratio of support(t=2.61,P0.01)and total scale of social support(t=3.42,P0.01)were significantly higher than those in control group.and the score of negative coping styles was significantly lower than that in control group(t=-2.72,P0.01).Conclusion Psychological intervention can improve coping style and social support of the aircrew.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第11期1690-1692,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 心理干预 飞行人员 应对方式 社会支持 Psychological intervention Aircrew Coping style Social support
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献60

共引文献3203

同被引文献29

  • 1汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 2陈彦方.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:31—90.
  • 3王维治.神经病学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:135.
  • 4National Institutes of Health NIH releases statement on behavioral and relaxation approaches for chornic pain and insomnia[J].Am Fam Physician1996,53:1877-1880.
  • 5McCrae C S.Late-life comorbid insomnia:Diagnosis and treatment[J].Am J Manag Care,2009,15(1):S14-S23.
  • 6Salzman C.Pharmacologic treatment of disturbed sleep in the elder-ly[J].Harv Rev Psychiatry,2008,16(5):271-278.
  • 7韩桐师,万憬,丹笑颖,庄开颜,尹燕.10例失眠症飞行员基本认知能力分析[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2007,18(3):222-222. 被引量:1
  • 8李金娜,王明旭,龙俊宏,张金惠,郑水利,王蓉,曹会芳,王利.理性情绪疗法对糖尿病患者心理行为的影响[J].护理管理杂志,2008,8(10):7-9. 被引量:15
  • 9付兆君,郑军,刘晶,崔丽,刘玉华,王露今,徐先荣.睡眠障碍飞行员工作绩效的改变[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(1):66-68. 被引量:9
  • 10李金娜,王明旭,王蓉,张金惠,郑水利,龙俊宏,曹会芳,王利.自我管理干预对糖尿病患者心理及行为的作用[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2009,24(7):72-74. 被引量:42

引证文献4

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部