期刊文献+

大学生考试作弊行为意向与移情能力 被引量:2

The Relationship between College Students' Behavior Intention of Cheating in Examination and Empathic Ability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨大学生移情能力与考试作弊行为意向之间的关系。方法运用大学生考试作弊行为意向问卷和移情问卷,对464名大学生进行问卷调查。结果①大学生考试作弊行为意向在性别(t=-4.877,P<0.00)和家庭所在地(t=-3.092,P<0.01)两个变量上存在显著差异;②移情与大学生考试作弊行为意向呈显著正相关(r=0.206,P<0.001);③不同移情能力的大学生在考试作弊行为意向存在显著差异(F=9.357,P<0.001);④移情对大学生考试作弊行为意向具有显著的正向预测作用。结论大学生移情能力对考试作弊行为有预测的作用,高校可以从培养大学生的移情能力来减少考试作弊的现象。 Objective To discuss the relationship between college students' empathic ability and the behavior intention of cheating in examination.Methods Using Questionnaire of College Students' Behavior Intention of Cheating in Examination and Empathy Questionnaire to survey 464 college students.Results ①College students' behavior intention of cheating in examination showed significant sex(t=-4.877,P0.00)and home place(t=-3.092,P0.01)differences.②It is shown that there was positive correlation between empathy and college students' behavior intention of cheating in examination(r=0.206,P0.001).③College students of different empathy ability showed significant differences(F=9.357,P0.001)on behavior intention of cheating in examination.④The empathy could forecast positively the college students' behavior intention of cheating in examination.Conclusion College students' empathic ability can forecast cheating behavior in examination.To decrease cheating in examination,colleges can cultivate students' empathy ability.
作者 贺英 李阳
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第11期1732-1734,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 考试作弊 行为意向 问卷调查 移情能力 Cheating in examination Behavior intention Questionnaire survey Empathy ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1兰刚.大学生考试作弊现象的实证研究[J].青年研究,1997(4):37-42. 被引量:10
  • 2龙景奎,陈韶君.构建大学生诚信考评体系的研究[J].教育探索,2006(10):101-103. 被引量:10
  • 3王丽娟.高校大学生考试作弊的社会心理动因及其对策研究[J].社会心理科学,2007,22(1):136-140. 被引量:23
  • 4Newstead, S. E., Arlene Franklyn-Stokes & Penny Armstead. lndiviudal Differences in Student Cheating [J]. Journal of Educational psychology, 1996, 88(2): 229-241.
  • 5Finn, K.V. & Frone, M. R. Academic Performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identifieation anti self-efficacy[J].Journal of Educational Research, 2004, 97:115-122.
  • 6Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., &Weber, M. J. Predictors of cheating a-mong early adolescents: Academic and social motivations[J]. Contem-porary Educational Psycholgy 2001, 26:96-115.
  • 7Murdoek, T. B. & Anderman, E. M. Molivational Perspectives on Student Cheating:. Toward an Integrated Model of Academic Dishonesty [J]. Journal of Educational Research, 2006, 41(3): 129-145.
  • 8Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. Effects of classroom context variables on high school students' judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2004, 96: 765-777.
  • 9Anderman,L.H.& Anderman,E.M.Social predictors of changes in students' achievement goal orientations[J].Contemporary Educational psychology,1999,25:21-37.
  • 10Pulvers,K.& Diekhoff,G.M.The relationship between academic dishonesty and collegc elassroom environment[J].Research in Higher Education,1999,40:487-498.

共引文献833

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部