高管团队行为整合、创新行为与创新绩效关系研究被引量：23

Research on the Relationship Among Top Management Team Behavioral Integration,Corporate Innovation and Innovative Performance

原文传递

导出

摘要综述了高管团队行为整合影响企业创新行为并进而实现创新绩效的过程机制,提出了研究的框架模型。在阐释高管团队行为整合、探索型创新和利用型创新定义的基础上,评述高管团队行为整合影响探索型创新和利用型创新的研究,综述并探讨探索型创新和利用型创新及其交互作用对创新绩效的作用机制。最后,进行了简要的总结和讨论。 More and more foreign scholars pay attention to the research of top management team behavioral inte- gration. Refers to previous researches, we review the process and mechanism of how top management teams make a difference on corporate innovation to realize the innovation performance, and put forward a theoretical re- search model. Based on the interpretation of the definitions of top management team behavioral integration, explor- atory innovation, and exploitative innovation, we make theoretical discussions about the relationship between top management team behavioral integration and corporate innovation （exploration and exploitation）, and review the im- pacts of exploration, exploitation, and their interaction on innovation performance. Further, we develop brief discus- sion, and conclusion.

作者丁安娜刘景江

机构地区浙江大学管理学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期71-76,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金浙江省钱江人才计划C类项目

关键词高管团队行为整合探索型创新利用型创新创新绩效 top management teams behavioral integration exploratory innovation exploitative innovation innova-tive performance

分类号 F272.91 [经济管理—企业管理] F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003(28):238-256.
2Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002(23): 1095-1121.
3He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An em- pirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organizat- ion Science, 2004(15):481-494.
4Hambrick D C. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label[J]. Res- earch in Organizational Behavior, 1994(16):171-214.
5Simsek Z, Veiga J F, Lubatkin M H, et al. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavi- oral integration[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(1):69-84.
6Mooney A C. The antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integrati- on[D]. Athens: University of Georgia, 2000.
7Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organ- ization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984(9): 193-206.
8Hackman J R. A Normative Model of work Team Effe- ctiveness[R]. New Haven: Yale University, 1983.
9Smith K G, Smith K A, Olian J D, et al. Top managem- ent team demography and process: The role of social in- tegration and communication[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994(39):412-438.
10Mooney A C, Sonnenfeld J. Exploring antecedents to co- nflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integration[C]. Washington, DC: Paper pre-sented in the Academy of Management Meeting, BPS Division, 2001.