期刊文献+

诱导水稻抗稻瘟病的前胡诱抗剂应用技术研究初探 被引量:1

The Application Technology of Botanical Elicitor from Common HogfenneI Root against Rice Blast
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水稻稻瘟病是世界性的重要病害,植物源诱抗剂前胡能提高水稻对稻瘟病菌的免疫力,对稻瘟病有较好的防控效果。本试验采用普通喷雾法,研究了WS-16卫士型喷雾器和工农16型喷雾器两种不同的器械施药时,前胡水乳剂对稻瘟病的防控效果,药液量为40 kg/667m2,施药时使水稻叶片正反两面受药均匀。结果表明:15%前胡水乳剂对稻瘟病的防治效果优于前胡水煮液和前胡原粉,WS-16卫士型和工农16型喷雾器喷施15%前胡水乳剂150倍液药后30 d的防效分别为80.09%和72.54%,药后67 d的增产率分别为5.93%和3.61%,效果均稍低于对照药剂三环唑和稻瘟灵。采用两种不同的施药器械喷施前胡水乳剂,其对稻瘟病的防效存在显著差异性,但对水稻的增产率无明显差异。 Rice blast is a worldwide disease. Botanical elicitors have better control effects to rice blast because of improving rice immunity. This paper studied control efficiencies of two kinds sprayer equipment, the liquor amount was 40 kg/667m^2, both sides of rice leaves was contacted with the liquid. The results showed that, control efficiency of 15% Radix Peucedani coumarin was better than decoction and raw powder. With WS-16 type sprayer and GN-16 type sprayer, the control effects 30 days after application of 15% Radix Peucedani coumarin were 80.09% and 72.54%, respecitively, the rate of yield increase were 5.39% and 3.61%, respectively. Both control effects and rate of yield increase were lower than the control treatments. Two kinds of different spraying equipment had significant differences on control effects to rice blast, but the rate of rice yield had not significant difference.
出处 《生物灾害科学》 2012年第3期320-322,共3页 Biological Disaster Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30971951) 湖南省科技计划项目(2010NK3028)
关键词 植物诱导因子 前胡诱抗剂 稻瘟病防治 施药器械 应用技术 botanical elicitor common hogfennel root rice blast control spraying equipment applied technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1余朝阁,李天来,须晖.植物诱导抗病性及诱抗性研究[C]∥中国植物病理学会2004年学术年会论文集.2004.
  • 2王再跃,冯春水,张剑.浏阳市一季稻稻瘟病发生特点及防治对策[J].作物研究,2006,20(2):156-157. 被引量:2
  • 3Allen S J. Genetic and induced resistance strategies for controlling Fusarium wilt of cotton[C]//Proceedings of the Second Australasian Soilborn Diseases Symposium. Victoria, Australia, 2001: 59-60.
  • 4Kessmann H. Induction of systemic acquired disease resistance in plantsby chemicals[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1994, 32: 439-459.
  • 5Colson-Hanks E S, Deverall B J. Effects of 2, 6-dichloroisonicotinic acid, its formulation materials and benzothiadiazole on systemic resistance to alternaria leaf spot in cotton[J]. Plant Pathology, 2000, 49: 441-456.
  • 6Cohen Y. Local and systemic activity of BABA (DL-3-amionbutyric acid) against Plasmopara viticolain grapevines[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 1999,105: 351-361.
  • 7邓雨艳,明建,张昭其,曾凯芳.壳聚糖诱导脐橙果实抗病性、水杨酸及活性氧代谢变化[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(4):812-820. 被引量:41
  • 8臧威,孙剑秋,张淑园,张兰兰.植物诱导抗病性及其机理的研究现状[J].种子,2006,25(9):45-50. 被引量:9
  • 9Gara L D, de Pinto M C, Tommasi systemsvis-h-vis reactive oxygen plant-pathogen interaction[J]. Plant Biochemistry, 2003, 41(10): 863-870. E The antioxidant species during Physiology and.
  • 10李静波,柏连阳,任新国,张亚,柏海玲,陈斌.诱抗剂及诱导对水稻稻瘟病抗性的机理研究进展[J].中国植保导刊,2008,28(1):15-18. 被引量:10

二级参考文献74

共引文献67

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部