期刊文献+

基于异质性复杂系统的高技术园区效率评价研究

A Research on High-Tech Parks' Efficiency Evaluation Based on the Heterogeneity of Complex Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高技术园区内企业和园区外的高技术企业是两个具有异质性的系统,具有不同的生产环境和生产特质,但对高技术产业而言,又拥有相同的目标和任务。异质系统间相对绩效的比较,可以反映出设立和运行高技术园区的效力,应是园区绩效评价中不可或缺的一部分。基于异质性复杂系统,将高技术园区的效率评价分解为运行效率和功能效率两部分,对我国高技术园区2010年的综合效率进行评价和比较,可鸟瞰我国各高技术园区的运行情况,以期为各高技术园区的效率地位评价和效率提升提供参考。 High-Tech enterprises in the High-Tech Parks and outside the Parks are two heterogeneous systems with different production environments and production characteristics,but both belong to High-Tech industry and have the same objectives and tasks.The relative performances of heterogeneous systems can be compared to reflect the effectiveness of High-Tech Parks established and operated,this work should be an integral part in the performance evaluation of High-Tech Parks.This study is based on heterogeneity of complex systems,and it takes a unique perspective to decompose the efficiency evaluation of High-Tech Parks into two parts(the operational efficiency and functional efficiency),and make an evaluation and comparison on overall efficiency of China's High-Tech Parks in 2010 on the basis of a two-stage DEA model and a combination of the super-efficiency evaluation and improved DEA model.
作者 严焰
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期131-138,163-164,共8页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目<面向中小企业的区域创新服务平台构建研究>(批准号:Y6090550) 杭州市科技情报调研项目<高新技术园区发展经验 效率评价及对杭州高新区的启示>(批准号:20110634M06)
关键词 高技术园区 效率评价 异质性系统 DEA模型 超效率模型 High-Tech Parks efficiency evaluation heterogeneous systems DEA model super-efficiency model
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Donald S. Siegel, Paul Westhead & Mike Wright. Sci- ence Parks and the Performance of New Technology- Based Firms : A Review of Recent U.K. Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research [ J ] . Small Business Eco- nomics, 2003, (20).
  • 2Lindelof P. & Ltffsten H.. Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden-Implications for Strategy and Performance [ J ]. Small Business Econom- ics, 2003, (20).
  • 3Lofsten H. & Lindelsf P.. Science parks in Sweden: In- dustrial renewal and development? [ J ]. R&D Manage- ment, 2001, (31).
  • 4Lindelof P. & Lofsten H.. Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer [ J ]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, (29).
  • 5Richard Ferguson & Christer Olofsson. Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs-Location, Survival and Growth [ J ]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, (29).
  • 6Lofsten H. & Lindelsf P.. R&D networks and product innovation patterns-academic and non-academic new tech- nology-based firms on science parks [ J ]. Technovation, 2005, (25).
  • 7Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Science Parks' tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model [J]. J Technol Transfer, 2008, 33.
  • 8Appold S. J.. Research Parks and the location of indus- trial research laboratories: An analysis of the effective- ness of a policy intervention [ J ]. Research Policy, 2004, (33).
  • 9陈先运.高新技术园的竞争力指标体系的构建与模型研究[J].山东理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,18(1):24-28. 被引量:3
  • 10郭岚,张祥建,徐晋.基于神经网络专家系统的高新技术园区竞争力分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(4):111-113. 被引量:6

二级参考文献103

共引文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部