期刊文献+

丙泊酚与七氟醚麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用效果的对照研究 被引量:8

Comparative study of propofol and sevoflurane in anesthesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析丙泊酚与七氟醚麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果。方法:回顾分析2009年2月至2012年3月为62例患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料,随机分为实验组与对照组。对照组采用瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚联合麻醉,观察组采用瑞芬太尼与七氟醚联合麻醉,对比分析两组患者应用效果。结果:实验组患者于气管插管后1 min、建立人工气腹前及建立人工气腹后5 min舒张压、收缩压及心率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在自主呼吸恢复、睁眼、拔管及定向力恢复用时等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:丙泊酚与七氟醚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果均较显著,但七氟醚麻醉可降低CO2气腹对患者产生的影响,能更平稳地维持患者的生命体征。 Objective:To compare the effect of propofol and sevoflurane in anesthesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 62 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from Feb.2009 to Mar.2012 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were randomly divided to two groups.In the control group,remifentanil and propofol were used and remifentanil and sevoflurane were used in the experimental group for combined anesthesia.The effects were comparatively studied.Results:The diastolic pressure,systolic pressure and heart rate in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 1min after endotracheal intubation,before establishment of artificial pneumoperitoneum and 5min after establishment of artificial pneumoperitoneum(P0.05).There were no significant differences in spontaneous breathing recovery,goggling,extubation and orientation recovery time(P0.05).Conclusions:Both propofol and sevoflurane have obvious anesthesia effect.However,sevoflurane could decrease the effect of impact of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on patients and maintain the vital signs more steadily.
机构地区 洪湖市人民医院
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2012年第11期867-869,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 麻醉 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 七氟醚 丙泊酚 麻醉效果 Anesthesia Cholecystectomy laparoscopic Sevoflurane Propofol Anesthesia effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨华凌,林财珠,方舒东.听觉诱发电位指数调控老年人靶控输注丙泊酚麻醉的研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2003,19(12):715-718. 被引量:9
  • 2宋莉 曾俊 张霞 等.瑞芬太尼.中国麻醉学论坛,2003,1(2):112-117.
  • 3Egan TD. Reminfentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. a preliminary appraisal [ J ]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1995, 29(2.): 80-94.
  • 4VERGHESE C, RAMASWAMY B. LMA-Supreme-a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 101(3): 405-410.
  • 5SEET E, RAJEEV S, FIROZ T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010, 27(7): 602-607.
  • 6VAN ZUNDERT A, BRIMACOMBE J. The LMA SupremeJ-a pilot study[J]. Anaesthesia, 2008, 63(2): 209-210.
  • 7TIMMERMANN A, CREMER S, HEUER J, et al. Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway Management [J]. Anaesthesist, 2008, 57(10): 970-975.
  • 8Kawamura T, Wakusawa R, Okada K, et al. Elevation of cytokines during open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: participation of interleukin 8 and 6 in reperfusion injury. Can J Anaesth, 1993, 40: 1016-1021.
  • 9Kawamura T, Kadosaki M, Nara N, et al. Effects of sevoflurane on cytokine balance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2006, 20:503-508.
  • 10Takesa S, Nakanishi K, Ikezaki H, et al. Cardiac marker responses to coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2002, 16: 421-425.

共引文献97

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部