期刊文献+

公司内部治理机制与企业竞争力研究——“代理成本”的分析视角 被引量:3

A Research of Internal Governance Mechanisms and Firms' Competence——From the View of Agency Costs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 竞争力是企业生存和发展的关键,创业板上市公司作为我国多层次资本市场的重要组成部分,其竞争力能否持续发展关系到我国资本市场能否健康发展。本文以我国创业板上市公司为研究样本,基于"代理成本"分析视角,构建公司内部治理各变量与公司竞争力的多元线性回归模型,对中国创业板上市公司的内部治理与公司竞争力进行实证分析,并在实证研究的基础上对如何完善我国创业板上市公司内部治理、提升公司竞争力提出了政策建议。 Competence is the crux to the survival and development of firms. Whether the competence of listed firms on GEM, which is an important part of multi-layer capital system of our country, can develop sustainably or not is related to the sound development of our capital system. In this article, by means of taking listed firms on GEM as research samples, and constructing multiple linear regression models, it conducted an empirical study between internal governance mechanisms varia- bles and firms' competence. And based on the empirical study, this article put forwards some measures to consummate the internal governance mechanism and improve firms' competence.
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期60-67,共8页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 江苏高校优势学科建设工程 南京财经大学科研基金项目(项目编号:A2011018) 江苏省博士后基金(项目编号:1101057C)的资助
关键词 创业板 内部治理机制 代理成本 竞争力 GEM internal governance mechanism agency costs competence
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1斯密.国富论[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2001.
  • 2Jensen,M. C. and Meckling W. H. , 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and OwnershipStructure^,Journal of Financial Economics ,3(4) :305-360.
  • 3Colin Mayer, 1995 , Corporate Governance Market and Transition Economies, For Presentation at the International Confer-ence on Chinese Corporate Governance, Shanghai, October.
  • 4钱颖一.企业的治理结构改革和融资结构改革[J].经济研究,1995,30(1):20-29. 被引量:269
  • 5MichaelC. Jensen, 1994, “The Modem Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems”,TheJournal of Applied Corporate Finance ,6(4) :4-23.
  • 6Jean Tirole,2001,“Corporate Governance”,Econometrica,69(1) :1-35.
  • 7Lipton,Martin and Jay Lorsch,1992,“ A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance”,Business Lawyer,48( 1 ):59-77.
  • 8Beasley M.,1996,“ An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial State-ment Fraud”,The Accounting Review,11 (4) :443-465.
  • 9朱杏珍.董事会的规模与效能探析[J].当代财经,2002(6):68-70. 被引量:10
  • 10Cheng S. J. ,2008 , “Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance”,Journal of Financial Economics, 87 :157-176.

共引文献941

同被引文献75

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部