期刊文献+

PET/CT在诊断口腔颌面部肿瘤颈淋巴结转移中的价值 被引量:5

Clinical application of PET/CT for the identification of cervical lymph node metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过与MRI检查比较,评价PET/CT(integrated PET-CT system)在诊断口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移中的临床价值。方法:前瞻性分析2008—2011年47例口腔颌面部肿瘤患者,于术前2周内分别进行PET/CT、MRI检查。分别获取PET/CT影像和MRI影像。以病理结果为金标准,分析2种方法判断颈部淋巴结转移的敏感度、特异度及准确率方面的差异。采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行χ2检验。结果:PET/CT、MRI判定颈淋巴结转移的敏感度分别为89.5%和73.7%(P<0.05);特异度分别为89.3%和78.6%(P>0.05);准确率分别为89.4%和76.6%(P<0.05)。结论:PET/CT在口腔颌面部肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移判定中的敏感度及准确率均优于MRI,差异具有统计学意义;PET/CT在口腔颌面部肿瘤颈淋巴结转移判定中作为一种辅助诊断方法,具有重要的临床价值。 PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical value of PET/CT in diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis of oral and maxillofacial cancers by comparison with MRI examination. METHODS: Forty-seven patients of oral and maxillofacial cancers underwent PET/CT and MRI examination 2 weeks before surgery. PET/CT and MRI were interpreted separately to assess regional lymph node status. Histopathological analysis was used as the gold standard for assessment of the lymph node involvement. Differences in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy among the imaging modalities were analyzed by SPSS13.0 software package for Chi-square test. RESULTS: The sensitivity of PET/CT and MRI for the identification of nodal metastases was 89.5% and 73.7% separately (P〈0.05), whereas the specificity of PET/CT and MRI was 89.3% and 78.6% separately (P〉0.05). The accuracy of PET/CT and MRI for the detection of cervical nodal metastases was 89.4% and 76.6%, respectively(P〈0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and accuracy of PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases was higher than that of MRI. PET/CT can serve as a supplementary method for the identification of cervical lymph node metastases of oral and maxillofacial cancers. Supported by Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Projeet(2008B030301182).
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期484-487,共4页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2008B030301182)~~
关键词 18F-FDG PET CT 口腔颌面部肿瘤 颈淋巴结转移 PET/CT Oral and maxillofacial cancer Cervical lymph node metastasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1S('ully C, Bagan J. Oral squamotts cell (arcinoma: overview of current undcrshmding o[" aetiopathogenesis and clinical implicationslJ]. Oral Dis, 2009, 15(6): 388-399.
  • 2Alvi A, Johnson JT. I'xtracapsular spread in the .linieally negatiw" nek (NO): implit'ations mitt outi'onleiJ].(1)tolaryngol Head Ne'k Surg, 1996, 114(1): 65-70.
  • 3Ambroseh P, Kron M. Fischer (,. et al. Mietmetastases m eareinc,ma of the upper aercdigestive tract: detection, risk of metastasizing, and prognostic value of depth of invasion [J]. Head Neck. 1995.17(6): 473-479.
  • 4中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会肿瘤学组.口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤颈淋巴结转移的外科诊治指南[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,3(1):3-9. 被引量:27
  • 5Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT,el al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official repo't [" the Aca(lem',,'s Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncohg" [JI. Arch OtolaTngol Head Neck Surg, 1991, I 17(6): 601-605.
  • 6Koshy M, Paulino AC, Howell R. et aI. F-18 FI)C PET-(iT fusion in ra(liotherapy trealment t)[anning fir hea(] and ne('k (.ancerIJI.Head Neck, :2005,27(5): 494-502.
  • 7Branstetter BF 4th, Bltxlgett TM. Zimmer I,A, l a]. Head mid nt'k malignancy: is I"ET/CT more accmale thml PET or CT done'[J].Radiology,2005.235(2): 580-586.
  • 8Seitz O, Chambrnn-Pinho N, Middcndnrp M. et al. 18F- FluonMenxygluose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gnss tumor vtlumt' hi" orophaTngeal anti oral cavity cantr: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen[ J ]. Neuroradiology,2009, 51 (1 0): 677-686.
  • 9Schoder tt, Carlson D1., Kraus DH. et al. 18F-FI)(; PET/CT fir detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral Gant'er stag,d N0 by t'lini'al examination and CqTMRI [J]..I Nu.l Med,2006, 47(5): 755-762.
  • 10Stoeckli SJ. Steinert H. Pfaltz M,et al. Is there a roh" for ptsitron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodexyglucose in tile initial staging of nodal negatiw oral and oropharyngcal squamoas cell earcinoma[J].Head Neck. 20(12, 24(4): 345-349.

二级参考文献32

  • 1王欣璐,王全师,吴湖炳,王明芳,王巧愚,李洪生,张雪林.口腔鳞癌的^(18)F-FDG PET/CT的影像学表现以及与CT平扫的比较研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(8):995-998. 被引量:6
  • 2Penny Whiting,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick MM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,刁骧(译),艾昌林(译),秦莉(审校),姚巡(审校).QUADAS的制定:用于系统评价中评价诊断性研究质量的工具[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):296-306. 被引量:67
  • 3Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et aL Cancer statistics, 2010[J]. CA Can- cer J Clin, 2010, 60(5):277-300.
  • 4邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学嗍.6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:230-289.
  • 5de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis com- paring US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 64 (2) : 266-272.
  • 6Hillman BJ, Goldsmith JC. The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(1):4-6.
  • 7Townsend DW, Carney JP, Yap JT, et al. PET/CT today and tomo- rrow[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(Suppl 1):4S-14S.
  • 8Nahmias C, Carlson ER, Duncan LD, et al. Positron emission to mography/computerized tomography(PET/CT) scanning for preope- rative staging of patients with oral/head and neck cancer[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65 (12) : 2524-2535.
  • 9Schoder H, Carlson DL, Kraus DH, et al. lSF-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged Noby clinical examination and CT/MRI[J]. J Nucl Med, 2006, 47 (5): 755-762.
  • 10Seitz O, Chambron-Pinho N, Middendorp M, et al. lSF-Fluoro- deoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tmnor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: Compari- son with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen[J]. Neuroradiology, 2009, 51 (10) :677-686.

共引文献39

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部