期刊文献+

强化混凝去除尖针杆藻的优化 被引量:4

Optimization Analysis on the Removal of Synedra Acus by Enhanced Coagulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对水源水藻类(优势藻为硅藻中的针杆藻)爆发问题,通过对比PAFS、PAC、PFC 3种混凝剂的除藻除浊效果,选取PAFS为最佳混凝剂;通过添加预氧化剂和助凝剂强化混凝除藻效果,结果表明使用助凝剂PDMDAAC对PAFS的助凝效果最好,其余药剂结合PAFS的除藻效果为PPC>ClO2>PAM>H2O2>HCA-1。用Box-Behnken Design(BBD)实验原理设计实验,研究pH值、搅拌速度、搅拌时间3因素对PAFS+PDMDAAC除藻效果的影响及最优除藻条件。结果表明:3因素对除藻的影响显著,且其显著程度为pH值>搅拌速度>搅拌时间,而3因素的交互影响对除藻的影响不太显著;强化混凝的最优条件为pH值为7.5、搅拌速度为75r/min、搅拌时间为15min,其除藻率为98.75%。 According to the algae outbreak (the dominant species was synedra acus belonging to Diatoms) in source water, the effects of PAFS, PAC, and PFC coagulants on algae removal and turbidity removal were compared. PAFS was chosen as the optimal coagulant. In addition, different pro-oxidations and coagulant aids were added to enhance flocculation removal effects of algae. The experimental results show that PDMDAAC combined with PAFC shows the best effect, and the order of other promoting coagulation effect was PPC ~ C102 ~ PAM ~ H202 ~ HCA-1. Based on the box-Behnken Design (BBD) experiment design principle, the effects of pH, stirring rate and stirring time on algae removal using PAFS+ PDMDAAC were investigated. The results show that the three factors play significant effect on the removal of synedra acus, and the influence degree is pH^stirring rate,stirring time, while the interactive influence of the three factors is not significant. Moreover, the optimum condition of enhanced coagulation is obtained, in which pH is of 7.5, stirring rate is 75r/rain and stirring time is 15 rain, and the alga removal effect is 98.75 %.
出处 《土木建筑与环境工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期120-125,共6页 Journal of Civil,Architectural & Environment Engineering
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2009ZX07424-004)
关键词 针杆藻 氧化 混凝 响应面分析 synedra acus, oxidation, coagulation, response surface analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Lee J D, Lee M S, Shin W S, et al. Removal of freshwater diatoms (synedra acus and stephanodiscus sp. ) by preozonation and addition of polyamine coagulant-aid [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2005,22 (5) : 682-686.
  • 2左金龙.城市供水中藻类去除技术的研究进展[J].环境科学与管理,2009,34(9):75-80. 被引量:7
  • 3Edzwald J K. Algae, bubbles, coagulants, and dissolved air flotation [J]. Water Science &Technology, 1993,27 (10) :67-81.
  • 4徐大伟,施永生,柳伟,陈原.除藻技术的研究进展[J].云南化工,2007,34(3):76-78. 被引量:11
  • 5国家环保局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 6刘启旺,胡俊虎,陈江平,王娜.复合型絮凝剂PAFS的研制及性能[J].水处理技术,2006,32(6):45-47. 被引量:8
  • 7Sinha S, Yoon Y, Amy G , et al. Determining the effectiveness of conventional and alternative coagulants through effective characterization schemes[J]. Chemosphere, 2004,57 : 1115-1122.
  • 8Cao X Y, Yue Q Y, Song L Y, et al. The performance and application of fly ash modified by PDMDAAC [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 147 (1/2): 133- 138.
  • 9张跃军,赵晓蕾,李潇潇,等.PAC/PDM复合混凝剂建冬季太湖原水的除藻性能研究[J].应用基础与工程私学报,2010,18(5):807-815.
  • 10陈卫,李圭白,邹浩春.PPC强化混凝除蓝藻除色度效果及致因研究[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(2):140-143. 被引量:11

二级参考文献71

共引文献96

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部