摘要
《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称为《人身损害赔偿解释》首次规定了经营者保护消费者免受第三人侵害的义务,为此类案件的审理提供了裁判依据。但对于如何认定经营者违反安全保障义务,在什么情况下可以免责问题,《人身损害赔偿解释》并未作明确的规定。因此,有必要对经营者违反安全保障责任的构成要件和免责事由展开论述。
Obligation of operators protect consumers from Infringement a third party makes is written Into ＂On Hearing judicial interpretation of Numbers of issues of law-application of compensation for personal injury cases＂ （hereinafter referred as judicial in- terpretation of compensation for personal injury） for the first time, which provides the basis of judgment for hearing such cases. But how to identify operators violate the obligation of safe control and cases that are free of obligation,which is not specified. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the component of which operators violate the obligation of safe control and cases of immunity for obligation.
出处
《兴义民族师范学院学报》
2012年第4期25-28,32,共5页
Journal of Minzu Normal University of Xingyi
