期刊文献+

气候变化背景下外国投资者与政府争端的解决——以我国双边投资协定为例 被引量:1

Dispute Settlement Between Foreign Investors and Host Governments in Low-Carbon Era——China's Bilateral Investment Agreements as Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国签订的双边投资协定中一般都规定了投资者与东道国政府间投资争端的解决方式,尤其是晚近我国所签订的双边投资协定多数允许投资者将争端提交国际仲裁。但是,在目前全球应对气候变化背景下,作为温室气体排放大国,我国有义务控制和减少温室气体的排放,采取相应的环境规制措施,这些环境规制措施可能会损害或影响到外国投资者在我国的利益。根据双边投资协定,外国投资者可能会将这些争端提交国际仲裁,我国有可能被国际仲裁庭裁定为此对外国投资者承担相应的赔偿责任。面对新形势,我国必须重新审视双边投资协定中投资者与东道国投资争端解决方式的相关规定。 Bilateral investment agreements signed by China generally provide for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and host governments, especially the majority of bilateral investment agreements recently signed by China allow investors to submit the disputes to international arbitration. However, in the current context addressing climate change globally, as a power country of greenhouse gas emissions, China has the obligation to con- trol and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and to take appropriate environmental regulation measures which may damage or impact interests of foreign investors in China. Foreign investors might submit the dispute to international arbitration under bilateral investment agreements, therefore China may bear the corresponding liability to the foreign investors for that purpose ruled by the international court of arbitration. Facing the new situation, China must re - examine the relevant provisions on investment disputes settlement between investors and host countries in bilateral investment agreements.
作者 刘万啸
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2012年第6期95-102,共8页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 中国博士后科学基金第四十九批面上资助项目:国际投资协定与气候变化--低碳时代的国际投资新规则(20110490504) 山东省2012年度高校人文社科研究计划项目:国际投资中的环境保护法律规制研究(J12WB08) 山东政法学院科研发展计划项目:低碳时代全球治理体系下的国际投资规则演变及对策研究(2012F08B)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 气候变化 低碳 投资协定 投资争端 环境规制措施 国际仲裁 climate change low carbon investment agreements investment disputes environmental regulation measures international arbitration
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1新华网.商务部:已与130个国家签订了双边投资保护协定[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.corn/fortune/2010-1I/01/e一12724364.htm.2010-11-01.
  • 2IISD and the Center for International Environmental Law ( C/EL), Revising the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules to Address State Arbitrations ( February 2007 ) [ EB/OL]. http ://www. iisd. org/pdf/2007/investment_revising_uncitral_arbitration, pdf, 2011.2.4.
  • 3United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. World Investment Report 2010 Overview.
  • 4Nicholas A. Robinson : The Sands of Time : Reflections on the Copenhagen Climate Negotiations, Pace Environmental Law Review, Volume 27, Issue 2 2010.
  • 5新浪财经.中国承诺:到2020年碳减排40%-45%[EB/OL].http://finance.sina.eom.cn/g/20091127/04257023484.shtml,2012-05-05.
  • 6余劲松.国际投资条约仲裁中投资者与东道国权益保护平衡问题研究[J].中国法学,2011(2):132-143. 被引量:168
  • 7Fiona Marshall with contributions from Aaron Cosbey and Deborah Murphy, Climate Change and International Investment Agreements: Obstacles or opportunities? March 2010, Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • 8ICSID. Tecmed v. Mexico, Award of 29 May 2003, para 198.
  • 9ICSID. Metalclad Award,ARB(AF) / 97 / 1 ,Aug. 30,2000,August 25.
  • 10韩秀丽.从国际投资争端解决机构的裁决看东道国的环境规制措施[J].江西社会科学,2010,30(6):22-27. 被引量:15

二级参考文献29

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 2LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 3See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 4See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 5Id., 320-324,.
  • 6CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 7Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.
  • 8See Anne van Aakenand Jurgen Kurtz, Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law, 12 J. Int' l Econ. L. 859 (2009).
  • 9SGS v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction( August 6 2003 ) [ EB/OL]. Para. 166.
  • 10Id. , Para. 168.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部