摘要
作为司法公正的重要组成部分和题中应有之义,程序正义的独立价值得到学术界和实务界的普遍认同。确立非法证据排除规则是实现程序正义的必然要求,是衡量一国法治观念进步程度与人权保障水平的主要指标之一。在2012年的刑事诉讼法再修改过程中,非法证据排除规则得到了进一步深化和健全,堪称一大亮点。然而,这也对公、检、法三机关的办案工作提出了新的要求和挑战,尤其是作为法律监督机关的人民检察院,为切实保障程序正义,必须正确把握非法证据排除规则的运用问题。
As an important part of the judicial justice,procedural justice independence value obtained in the academic circles and the practical circles.Establishing exclusionary rule of illegal evidence is the realization of procedural justice is the inevitable requirement,is a measure of a country's law idea of progress degree and the guarantee of human rights the main index of degree.In the 2012 revision of criminal procedure law in the process,the exclusionary rules of illegal evidence has been further deepened and perfect,is a major bright spot.However,this is also the case for the public security organs has put forward new demands and challenges,especially as the legal supervision organ,people's Procuratorate,for cogent safeguard the procedural justice,we must correctly grasp the exclusion rule of illegal evidence and application.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期10-14,107,共5页
Henan Social Sciences
关键词
非法证据排除
两个证据规定
程序正义
Illegal evidence exclusion
The two rules of evidence
Procedural justice