再谈古籍整理的学术规范问题

On the academic standard of reorganiziing ancient works

詹先生主编的《李白全集校注汇释集评》问世 ,在古籍整理的学术规范上引起了强烈的反响 ,其中最富于代表性的是郁贤皓先生的《从〈李白全集校注汇释集评〉想到古籍整理的学术规范问题》和葛景春先生的《也谈古籍整理的学术规范问题》。两篇文章 ,针锋相对 ,各抒己见。针对当前学术界在古籍整理学术规范所存在的一些问题 ,结合两篇的争议 ,具体表明了自己对古籍整理学术规范的一些意见 :古籍整理的串解 ,应博采古今众说之长 ,由编者客观地融会贯通 ,使之能真正体现原诗文的本义。古籍整理的引证 ,该注明出处的最好注明出处 ,对有些古籍必须结合今人成果才可能引证清楚的 ,应当结合今人的成果来引证 ,并加以注明。大量引证见在今人成果 ,应征得作者赞同。对见在今人的评点 ,最好取其赞同之处 ,不同之处 ,可以另外撰文商榷。古籍整理的商榷 ,要实事求是 。

This paper offers several suggestions on the academic standardization of reorganizingancient works.In explaining ancient works,Compilers are expected to learn widely about the strong points of both ancient and present achievements and achieve a thorough mastery of the spirits of original works.In quoting, compilers are supposed to give references,and quote with sources indicated on the basis of contemporary achievements when necessary.If a lot of quotations of contemporary works are demanded, compilers should ask for authors′approval.If contemporary comments are needed, compilers are wished to adopt the points they agree with.At last, compilers should take up a matter of fact attitude in discussing ancient works.