期刊文献+

Thermal performance analysis of borehole size effect on geothermal heat exchanger 被引量:2

Thermal performance analysis of borehole size effect on geothermal heat exchanger
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Thermal performance was the most important factor in the development of borehole heat exchanger utilizing geothermal energy.The thermal performance was affected by many different design parameters,such as configuration type and borehole size of geothermal heat exchanger.These eventually determined the operation and cost efficiency of the geothermal heat exchanger system.The main purpose of this work was to assess the thermal performance of geothermal heat exchanger with variation of borehole sizes and numbers of U-tubes inside a borehole.For this,a thermal response test rig was established with line-source theory.The thermal response test was performed with in-line variable input heat source.Effective thermal conductivity and thermal resistance were obtained from the measured data.From the measurement,the effective thermal conductivity is found to have similar values for twopair type(4 U-tubes)and three-pair type(6 U-tubes)borehole heat exchanger systems indicating similar heat transfer ability.Meanwhile,the thermal resistance shows lower value for the three-pair type compared to the two-pair type.Measured data based resistance have lower value compared to computed result from design programs.Overall comparison finds better thermal performance for the three-pair type,however,fluctuating temperature variation indicates complex flow behavior inside the borehole and requires further study on flow characteristics. Thermal performance was the most important factor in the development of borehole heat exchanger utilizing geothermal energy. The thermal performance was affected by many different design parameters, such as configuration type and borehole size of geothermal heat exchanger. These eventually determined the operation and cost efficiency of the geothermal heat exchanger system. The main purpose of this work was to assess the thermal performance of geother^nal heat exchanger with variation of borehole sizes and numbers of U-tubes inside a borehole. For this, a thermal response test rig was established with line-source theory. The thermal response test was performed with in-line variable input heat source. Effective thermal conductivity and thermal resistance were obtained from the measured data. From the measurement, the effective thermal conductivity is found to have similar values for two- pair type (4 U-tubes) and three-pair type (6 U-tubes) borehole heat exchanger systems indicating similar heat transfer ability. Meanwhile, the thermal resistance shows lower value for the three-pair type compared to the two-pair type. Measured data based resistance have lower value compared to computed result from design programs. Overall comparison finds better thermal performance for the three-pair type, however, fluctuating temperature variation indicates complex flow behavior inside the borehole and requires further study on flow characteristics.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2012年第12期3524-3529,共6页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Project financially supported by the Second Stage of Brain Korea 21 Projects and Changwon National University,Korea
关键词 热性能分析 地热换热器 尺寸效应 井眼 换热器系统 配置类型 设计参数 热交换器 large size borehole heat exchanger thermal response test effective thermal conductivity thermal resistance borehole
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1ZENG H, DIAO N, FANG Z. Heat transfer analysis of boreholes in vertical ground heat exchanger[J]. Intemational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 46(23): 4467-4481.
  • 2CUI P, YANG H, FANG Z. Heat transfer analysis of ground heat exchangers with inclined boreholes [J]. Applied ThermalEngineering, 2006,26(ll/12):l169 I175.
  • 3YANG W, SHI M, LUI G, CHEN Z. A two region simulation model of vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger and its experimental verification [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(10): 2005-2012.
  • 4SHARQAWY M H MOKHEIMER E M, BADR H M. Effective pipe-to-borehole thermal resistance for vertical grotmd heat exchangers [J]. Geothermics, 2009, 38(2): 271-277.
  • 5OPPELT T, RIEHL I, GROSS U. Modelling of the borehole filling of double U-pipe heat exchangers [J]. Geothermies, 2010, 39(3): 270-276.
  • 6ESLAMI-NEJAD P, BERNIER M. Heat transfer in double U-tube boreholes with two independent circuits [J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2011,133(8): 082801.1-12.
  • 7AL-KHOURY R, KOLBEL T, SCHRAMEDEI R. Efficient numerical modeling of borehole heat exchangers [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2010, 36(10): 1301-1315.
  • 8LEE C K, LAM H N. Computer simulation of borehole ground heat exchangers for geothermal heat pump systems [J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(6): 1286-1296.
  • 9CARLI M D, TONON M, ZARRELLA A, ZECCHIN R. A computational capacity resistance model (CaRM) for vertical ground- coupled heat exchangers [J]. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(7) 1537-1550.
  • 10SHANG Y, LI S, LI H. Analysis of geo-temperature recovery under intermittent operation of ground-source heat pump [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2011, 43(4): 935-943.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部