期刊文献+

美国政府间事权、税权的划分及法律平衡机制 被引量:12

The Legal Balance Mechanism of American Governance Division Powers and Taxation Powers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国的政府结构分为联邦、州和地方三级,三级政府在事权划分上遵从宪法主义原则,即联邦宪法明确列举联邦政府的事权范围,给予州和地方政府以保留的事权。三级政府间税权的大小则建立在事权划分的基础上,力求做到税权与事权的相匹配;在税权的用税权内涵中,美国各级政府则呈现出更侧重于公共服务和管理,较少涉足基础设施建设等特点;只有在州和地方政府财政收入不足以弥补财政支出的空缺时,联邦政府才会通过政府间转移支付制度来寻求达到各级政府间的财政均衡的目的。正是以上诸种制度的有机结合,促使各级政府各司其职、各负其责,但又相互配合、相互补充。美国政府在事权与税权的划分、用税权方面呈现出的财政支出与财政转移立法等立法与实践,对我国平衡央地关系和地区间统筹发展,从而解决我国政府因事权与税权不匹配而反复出现的政府职能"越位"、"缺位"、"空位"等问题具有重要启示。 American government structure is divided into three levels: federal.state and local, the division of governance division complies with the con- stitutionalism principle, it enumerates the scope of governance division powers, and reserved powers to the states and local governments, thereby they have great independence ; the taxation powers size of them is based on division of governance division powers, matching with the relationship of governance divi- sion powers and taxation powers, which involveing the power of using taxation, they [ocuse on public service and management, and less involved in infra- structure construction ; as the revenue of the state and local government is not enough to make up for the vacancy of financial expenditure, the federal gov- ernment will use the intergovernmental transfer payment system to solve it. Therefore, the organic union of above systems makes all governments to perform their respective duties, they can complement each other by mutual cooperation. The legislations and practices of America, especially those: the division of the governance division powers and taxation powers; the legislations of financial expenditure and transfer financial on the power of using taxation, have important enlightenments for our,for example: the balance of the central -local relationship and regional development as a whole, solve the problems of mismatching on routine powers and taxation powers which often lead to the governments absent from, exceed and mistaken their duties.
作者 刘丽 张彬
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期53-58,76,共7页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金项目"中央与地方税权关系法治化的路径选择研究"(编号:10CFX056)成果之一
关键词 美国政府 事权与税权 联邦宪法 财政支出 转移支付 American govemment governance division powers and taxation powers the Federal Constitution financial expenditure transfer payments
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1"UNDP 中国促进减贫的财政能力建设"项目赴美培训税收科研课题组,孙红梅,修兴高,甘霖,吴燕,刘丽.美国税权划分制度评析与借鉴[J].涉外税务,2007(2):31-36. 被引量:1
  • 2Howard Chernick.Block Grants for the Needy:The Case of AFDC[J].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,1982,1 (2):209-222.
  • 3Kenneth Finegold,Laura Wherry,Stephanie Schardin.Block Grants Historical Overview and Lessons Learned[EB/OL].(2004-04-21)[2009-10-20].http://www.urban.org/url.cfm? ID= 310991.
  • 4Timothy J.Conlan.The Politics of Federal Block Grants:From Nixon to Reagan[J].Political Science Quarterly,1984,99 (2):247-270.
  • 5Diana Romero,Wendy Chavkin,Paul H.Wise.The Impact of Welfare Reform Policies on Child Protective Services:A National Study[J].Journal of Social Issues,2000,56 (4):799-810.
  • 6LaDonna A.Pavettl.Creating a New Welfare Reality:Early Implementation of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program[J].Journal of Social Issues,2000,56(4):601-616.
  • 7Jeanne M.Lambrew.Making Medicaid a Block Grant Program:An Analysis of the Implication of Past Proposals[J].The Milbank Quarterly,2005,83 (1):41-63.
  • 8《2009年全国接收各类捐赠款物332.78亿捐款227.5亿》,2010年4月8日,http://new.163.com/10/0408/18/63P5302U000146BD.html.
  • 9[日]室井力 吴微译.《日本现代行政法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1995年版.第51、34页.
  • 10[英]威廉·韦德.《行政法》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年版.第7页.

共引文献31

同被引文献144

引证文献12

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部