摘要
目的探讨bcl-2蛋白表达以及Hans、Chan及Muris分类模型对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)预后的提示意义。方法收集常规及会诊的237例DLBCL患者病例,对其石蜡切片行免疫组织化学EnVision法染色,检测Ki-67、CD3、CD45RO、CD20、CD79a、bcl-2、bcl-6、CD10、MUM-1、GCET-1、FOXP-1的表达。使用Hans、Chan及Muris分类模型进行分组并结合临床数据进行分析。结果男性131例,女性106例,平均年龄52.6岁。淋巴结发病最为常见(31.6%,75/237),结外发病以胃肠道(45.2%,71/157)为多见。Ki-67、CD3、CD45RO、CD20、CD79a、bcl-2阳性率分别为96.4%(215/223)、0、14.5%(11/76)、99.1%(231/233)、81.7%(85/104)、61.5%(139/226),分类标志物GCET-1、CD10、bcl-6、MUM-1及FOXP-1阳性率分别为27.9%(43/154)、24.8%(57/230)、50.2%(116/231)、46.3%(105/227)、80.2%(142/177)。患者均有完整随访资料,中位生存期为103.9个月,3年生存率51.3%(98/191)。bcl-2阴性组预后明显好于阳性组(P=0.019)。230例按Hans模型分组,95例为生发中心B细胞(GCB)组,135例为非GCB组,两组预后差异无统计学意义(P=0.102);181例按Chan模型分组,68例为GCB组,113例为非GCB组,GCB组预后明显好于非GCB组(P=0.031)。218例按Muffs模型分组,154例为Groupl组,64例为Group2组,Groupl组预后明显好于Group2组(P=0.023)。bcl-2与Chan模型结合分组,bel-2蛋白在非GCB组中表达明显增高(P=0.028),非GCB中bcl-2阳性表达组预后最差,GCB中bcl-2阴性表达组预后最好,不同分组预后差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论国人DLBCL以非GCB更为常见,bel-2蛋白在非GCB组中表达明显增高。bel-2蛋白表达、Chan模型及Muris模型具有预后提示意义,bcl-2结合Chan模型是目前临床上明确肿瘤细胞起源、提示临床预后的最佳组合。
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of bcl-2 protein expression and three classification algorithms including Hans model, Chan model and Muris model in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods Two-hundred and thirty-seven cases were collected. Standard two- step EnVision method of immunohistochemical staining was used to assess the expression of Ki-67, CD3, CIMSRO, CD20, CD79a, bcl-2, bcl-6, CD10, MUM-l, GCET-1, and FOXP-1. The phenotypic classifications were assessed according to the standard of the three models. Results The male( 131 cases) to female( 106 cases) ratio was about 1.24: 1, the average age was 52. 6 years. Seventy-five cases (31.6% , 75/237) showed primarily lymph node involvement. Gastrointestinal tract (71 cases ) was the most commonly involved extra-nodal organ. All cases expressed one or more pan B cell markers such as CD20 (99. 1%, 231/233). All patients with complete clinical follow-up data survived from 1-120 months. The expression of bcl-2 protein indicated an adverse prognosis(P = 0. 019). Two-hundred and thirty cases were classified according to Hans model, with ninety five GCB cases and one-hundred and thirty five non-GCB cases. Survival analysis showed no difference between GCB and non-GCB subtypes(P = 0. 102). Accordingto the Chan's algorithm, sixty eight case of one-hundred and eighty one were belong to GCB group, with one- hundred and thirteen non-GCB cases. GCB subtype showed much better prognosis than non-GCB subtype according to survival analysis ( P = 0. 031 ). Additionally, bcl-2 protein expression in non-GCB subtype showed the worst survival. In Muris' model, 154 of 218 cases were classified as Group 1, while 64 cases were classified as Group 2. Group 1 showed better prognosis than Group 2 ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Non-GCB group is the more common type of DLBCL in China. High expression of bcl-2 protein is detected in the non-GCB group. Not all subgroups classified with different classification models indicate different prognosis. Bcl-2 expression combined with Chan's algorithm may be the best tool to predict outcome.
出处
《中华病理学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第12期813-817,共5页
Chinese Journal of Pathology
基金
北京市自然科学基金(7102101)