《太原理工大学学报》(社科版)各学科来稿学术不端检测结果分析

Analysis on the Testing Results of Academic Misconduct in the Manuscripts Sent to the Social Science Edition of the Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology

利用社科期刊学术不端文献检测系统(SMLC)对《太原理工大学学报》(社科版)509篇自由来稿进行查重,发现各学科来稿学术不端行为的差异较大,这主要与作者和稿源有密切的关系,指出了SMLC作用的局限性,提出编辑应客观对待检测结果,结合自己的专业素养,有针对性地对各学科的来稿进行排查,把好期刊质量关。

Testing the 509 manuscripts sent to the Social Science Edition of the Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology with Social Sciences Periodicals Misconduct Literature Detection System（SMLC）,we find that there are many differences in the ratio of academic misconduct in the manuscripts of vavious disciplines,which is closely related to the authors and the origin of the manuscripts.This paper points out the limitation of SMLC and suggests that editors should take an objective attitude toward the testing results,make use of their own professional quality,give pertinent check to the manuscripts and guarantee the quality of the periodical.