期刊文献+

枢轴命题理论及其对传统知识论的挑战与启示 被引量:1

The Theory of Hinge Propositions and Its Challenges to Traditional Epistemology and Its Inspirations
原文传递
导出
摘要 枢轴命题是维特根斯坦在《论确定性》中提出的一类起基础作用、具有特殊特征的命题,其特征有:不可怀疑性、不可知性、不可确证性和语境性。枢轴命题理论明显地挑战传统知识论的智慧,其挑战表现在信念论、确证观和知道观上,并对当代知识论的发展具有重要的启示作用。研究枢轴命题理论有助于我们更深入地了解维特根斯坦的哲学及其贡献。 The hinge proposition is a kind of propositions put forward by Wittgenstein in his On Certainty,which play a fundamental role and have special features.It is undoubtable,unknowable,unjustifiable and contextual.The theory of hinge propositions clearly challenges the wisdom of traditional epistemology.To be specific,the theory challenges the traditional theory of belief,the theory of justification and the theory of knowledge.It will be illuminating to the development of contemporary epistemology.By studying the theory,we'll have a better understanding of Wittgenstein's philosophy and his contributions.
作者 曹剑波
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期48-54,126,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目<怀疑与确证>和<实验哲学>(2010221058 2012221003) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划<实验知识论>(NCET-11-0290) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目资助<对话与语境>(10YJC730001) 福建省社科规划项目立项<马克思主义视野下的宗教对话理论研究(>2012B161) 福建省教育科学"十二五"规划常规课题重点项目<道德教育的实验哲学研究>(FJCGZZ12-003)
关键词 枢轴命题 维特根斯坦 不可怀疑性 不可知性 不可确证性 语境性 Hinge propositions Wittgenstein Undoubtability Unknowability Unjustifiability Contextuality
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Wittgenstein, L. On Certainty [M), Paul, D., Anseombe, G. E. M. ( trans. ) , Anscombe, G. E. M., von Wright, G. H.(eds.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1969.
  • 2Williams, M. Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism [ M 1, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
  • 3Kober, M. Certainties of a World-Picture: The Epistemological Investigations of On Certainty [A, Sluga, H., Stem, D.G.(Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein [C, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 4Clifford, W. K. The Ethics of Belief [ A , McCarthy, G.D.(Ed.), The Ethics of Belief Debate [ C J, Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press, 1986.
  • 5James, W. The Will to Believe [ A J, in McCarthy, G.D. (Ed.), The Ethics of Belief Debate [ C , Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press,1986.
  • 6Woherstorff, N. Reason within the Bounds of Religion Alone M ,Grand Rapids: Erdmans, 1976.
  • 7曹剑波.“坚信”还是“轻信”:证据主义的困境与出路[J].学术月刊,2010,42(5):41-47. 被引量:4
  • 8弓肇祥:认识论逻辑[A],王雨田:现代逻辑科学导引(下册)[c],北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.
  • 9潘天群.群体对一个命题可能的知道状态分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,19(11):35-38. 被引量:4
  • 10曹剑波.怀疑主义难题的摩尔式解答[J].南京社会科学,2006(6):63-69. 被引量:3

二级参考文献42

  • 1Alvin Plantinga, "Is Belief in God Properly Basic?" Nous 1981(15), p. 41.
  • 2William Kingdon Clifford, "The Ethics of Belief", in Louis P. Pojman(ed. ), The Theory of Knowledge. 3rd. ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2003, p. 518.
  • 3Kelly James Clark, Return to Reason : A Critique of Enlightenment Evidentialism, and a Defense of Reason and Belief in God, Michigant William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. , 1990, pp. 132-133.
  • 4Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty, D. Paul & G. E.M. Anscombe(trans. ), G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. yon Wright(eds.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969, p. 411, p. 151.
  • 5Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 94-95.
  • 6Kelly James Clark, Return to Reason, p. 136.
  • 7Nicholas Wolterstorft', Reason within the Bounds of Religion Alone, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976, pp. 42-51, p. 52, p. 24.
  • 8Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief, p. 93, p.93.
  • 9Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief, p. 97.
  • 10[美]麦克·彼得森等.《理性与宗教信念--宗教哲学导论》,第144页,孙毅、游斌译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2005.

共引文献9

同被引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部