期刊文献+

负二项抽样下需处理数置信区间构造方法的改进 被引量:1

IMPROVED CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT UNDER NEGATIVE BINOMIAL SAMPLING
原文传递
导出
摘要 负二项抽样因其在发病率很低的情况下的优良表现而被广泛应用于流行病学及其它学科之中."需处理数"是一种度量药物疗效的重要指标,它常常用来评价那些结果是二值变量的临床试验所研究的药物的疗效.在实际应用中,通常希望得到需处理数的置信区间,但是目前已有的需处理数的置信区间构造方法都存在一个应用上的难题:区间上限过大以至于不可靠.文章旨在解决需处理数区间上限估计过大的问题,为此提出了需处理数的最短区间构造方法并运用蒙特卡洛模拟方法比较其相对传统方法的优劣,还给出了实际应用的例子.模拟结果表明:改进后的方法能够在控制置信系数的情况下极大地减小区间上限,具有重要的实际价值. Negative binomial sampling are wildy used in epidemiology and many other fields owing to its good performance in binary results clinical trails when the prevalence of the disease is rare. As a measurement of drug effect of randomized controlled trials with binary outcomes, the number needed to treat (NNT) is a useful way of reporting trials results. In clinical appliction, we prefer to report the confidence interval of the number needed to treat. The most popular confidence interval for a number needed to treat is the Wald type interval. Unfortunately, the upper confidence limit of Wald type interval often trends to be unreliable. In this paper, the shortest interval is proposed as an improved confidence interval for the number need to be treat which can reduce the upper confidence limit of the interval. Monte Calro Simulation method is used to compare the perfromance of the improved interval with the Wald type interval, and two illustratvie examples show that the improved interval has a coverage probablity close to the confidence coefficient 95% and can reduce the upper confidence limit of interval significantly, which is of practical importance.
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1047-1056,共10页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(11271368) 教育部人文社会重点研究基地重大项目(08JJD910247) 教育部科学技术研究重点项目(108120) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(12JGB051) 中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(10XNK025),中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(重大基础研究计划)(10XNL018) 全国统计科研计划项目(2011LZ031)资助课题
关键词 需处理数 Wald区间 最短区间 蒙特卡洛模拟 负二项抽样 Number needed to treat, Wald type interval, shortest interval, Monte Carlosimulation, negative binomial sampling
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Laupacis A, Sackett D L, Roberts R S. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the conse- quences of treat. New Engl. J. Med., 1988, 318: 1728-1733.
  • 2Malmberg K. Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. British Medical Journal, 1997, 314: 1512-1515.
  • 3Cook R J, Sackett D L. The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treat effect. British Medical Journal, 1995, 310: 452-454.
  • 4Sackett D L, et al. Down with odds ratios. Evidence-Based Medicine, 1996, 1: 164-166.
  • 5王珍,张永红.NNT在疗效评价研究中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2010,27(5):549-551. 被引量:9
  • 6Daly E L. Confidence limits made easy: Interval estimation using a substitution method. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998, 147: 783-790.
  • 7Chatllier G, et al. The number needed to treat: A clinically useful nomogram in its proper context. British Medical Journal, 1996, 312: 426-429.
  • 8Altman D G. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. British Medical Journal, 1998, 317: 1309-1312.
  • 9Bender R. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Control Clinical T~ials, 2001, 22(2): 102-110.
  • 10Newcombe R G, Altman D G. Proportions and Their Difference. London: BMJ Books, 2000.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Kristiansen I,Gyrd-Hansen D,Nexe J,et al.Number needed to treat:Easily understood and intuitively meaningful? Theoretical considerations and a randomized trial.J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:888-892.
  • 2Moher D,Schulz K,Altman D.The CONSORT statement:Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.Ann Intern Med,2001,134:657-662.
  • 3Toms L,McQuay H,Derry S,et al.Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008:CD004602.
  • 4Bowry A,Brookhart M,Choudhry N.Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel plus aspirin as compared to antiplatelet monotherapy for the prevention of vascular events.Am J Cardiol,2008,101:960-966.
  • 5Bangalore S,Wetterslev J,Pranesh S,et al.Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery:a meta-analysis.Lancet,2008,372:1962-1976.
  • 6Moore R,McQuay H.Bandolier's Little Book of Making Sense of the Medical Evidence.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2006.

共引文献8

同被引文献13

  • 1袁长迎,徐明民.伽玛分布参数的最短置信区间[J].数理统计与管理,2006,25(4):435-437. 被引量:21
  • 2张红兵,刘瑞元,李杰.双参数指数分布参数的最短置信区间[J].内江师范学院学报,2007,22(6):19-22. 被引量:5
  • 3Lui K J. Confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies under inverse sampling. Biomet- rical Journal, 1995, 8: 965-971.
  • 4Fleiss J L. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1986.
  • 5Lui K J. Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk. Wiley: West Sussex, 2004.
  • 6Tian M, Tang M L, Ng H K T, et al. Confidence intervals for the risk ratio under inverse sampling. Statistics in Medicine, 2008, 27(17): 3301-3324.
  • 7Rao C R. Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with appli- cation to problems of estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 44: 50-57.
  • 8Hirji K F. Exact Analysis of Discrete Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, 2006.
  • 9孙慧玲.取定统计量下最优置信区间的估计[J].统计与决策,2009,25(7):6-9. 被引量:22
  • 10岑忠,丁勇.泊松分布参数的最短置信区间[J].中国卫生统计,2010,27(2):133-135. 被引量:6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部