摘要
欲望和道德的关系一直是先秦儒家哲学的一个中心议题。无论是孔子、孟子还是荀子,他们都主张克服欲望的羁绊,塑造道德的人格。然而在如何达到这一目的的途径上,他们持有不同的立场。孟子主张通过"寡欲""养气""立志"的内在方式来实现对于欲望的克服和道德良知的发展;荀子则主张通过学习"礼法"的外在努力来充实"义",使之成为克服和疏导欲望和情感的道德力量。相比于孟子的内在方式而言,荀子的外在方式无疑更加具有现实性和可操作性,能够更加有效地实现儒家道德理想。
The relationship between desires and moralities is a central issue in pre-Qin Confucian philosophy. Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi all argued for overcoming the barriers of desires and cultivating moral character. However, as for the approaches to attaining this goal, they held different positions. Mencius argued for an internal approach, that is, " reducing desires", " nourishing vital energy", and " having aspirations", to overcome the desires and develop the moral sprout; while Xunzi argued for an external approach, that is, studying the rituals and laws and regulations to fill up yi (propriety), which could become the moral force in overcoming and channeling the desires and emotions. Compared with the Mencius' internal approach, Xunzrs external approach is more realistic and operative, and therefore, it could attain the Confucian moral ideal more effectively.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期31-37,共7页
Social Sciences of Beijing
基金
国家人力资源与社会保障部留学人员科技活动择优资助启动类项目暨北京市2012年度留学人员科技活动择优资助优秀类项目
关键词
欲望
孟子
荀子
心
气
义
desires
Mencius
Xunzi
heart/mind
vital energy
yi (propriety)