期刊文献+

民机客舱下部吸能结构分析与试验相关性研究 被引量:24

Correlation Study of Crash Analysis and Test of Civil Airplane Sub-cabin Energy Absorption Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 以民机典型机身段客舱下部结构为研究对象,建立了结构坠撞有限元模型,利用LS-Dyna软件进行了结构能量吸收特性分析。基于吸能结构思想,以降低传递到客舱地板的加速度载荷为设计目标,提出了一种民用飞机客舱地板下部结构吸能设计方法。设计制造了全尺寸的吸能结构试件,并进行了垂直坠撞试验。为评估坠撞分析与试验的相关性,提出了一种基于能量的能量吸收特性评估方法。首先对预试验分析结果与试验结果进行了相关性分析,根据相关性分析结果对分析模型进行了修正。修正后坠撞分析结果与试验结果的相关性表明,乘员质心处的平均加速度响应峰值误差为16.44%,最大平均反弹速度误差为10.53%,修正后模型的总体刚度与实际结构一致,分析获得的结构总体变形模式与试验结果基本一致。但能量吸收时间和加速度峰值出现的时间与试验结果相比误差较大,表明结构连接失效等结构建模细节对计算结果有显著的影响。 A finite element crash model of a typical civil airplane sub-cabin structure is developed and then a structural energy absorption analysis is conducted with the LS-Dyna code. An energy absorption design method is introduced based on en- ergy absorption structure concept to minimize the cabin floor acceleration response. Then a full-scale test article is designed and manufactured, and a drop test is conducted to verify the design features and the modeling method. A correlation evalua- tion method based on energy is introduced, and the finite element model is updated after the correlation analysis between the pre-test analysis results and the test results. The updated analysis results show good agreement with the test results. The er- ror of the average peak acceleration response at the centroid of the simulated occupant is 16.44%, and the error of the av- erage maximum rebound velocity of the model is 10.53%. The global deformation modes of the test and simulation also fit well. But the error of the energy absorption duration and time when the peak acceleration appears are fairly large, which in- dicates that certain structural modeling features, such as the structural joint dynamic failure mode, have significant impact on the computational results.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2202-2210,共9页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
关键词 民用飞机 吸能设计 吸能结构 坠撞试验 适坠性 civil airplane energy absorption design energy absorption structure drop test crashworthiness
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Al-khalil M. Overview of aircraft accidents in the last 10 years. CRAHVI Workshop: Crash and Impact Modeling of Structures, 2002.
  • 2European Transport Safety Council. Increasing the surviv- al rate in aircraft accidents: impact protection, fire surviv- ability and evacuation. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council, 1996.
  • 3Fasanella E L, Jackson K E, Jones Y T, et al. Crash sire ulation of a Boeing 737 fuselage section vertical drop test Proceedings of the Third KRASH User' s Conference, 2001.
  • 4Byar A. A crashworthiness study of a Boeing 737 fuselage section. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University, 2003.
  • 5Fasanella E L, Widmayer E, Robinson M P. Structural analysis of the controlled impact demonstration of a jet transport airplane. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(4) : 274 -280.
  • 6Lepage F. Results of the airliner sub-passenger floor structure drop test. CRASURV, CEAT Test Report S98/ 4449000 part5, 2000.
  • 7Jackson K E. Analytical crash simulation of three compos- ite fuselage concepts and experimental correlation. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1997, 42(2) : 116-125.
  • 8Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crashworthy evaluation of a 1/5-scale model composite fuselage concept. NASA/TM- 1999-209132, 1999.
  • 9苟仲秋,孙侠生,宋笔锋.农林飞机简化框体模型坠撞仿真及优化[J].机械强度,2008,30(3):396-399. 被引量:9
  • 10任毅如,向锦武,罗漳平,郑建强.客舱地板斜撑杆对民机典型机身段耐撞性能的影响[J].航空学报,2010,31(2):271-276. 被引量:24

二级参考文献32

  • 1陈永刚,益小苏,许亚洪,唐邦铭,张子龙.Carbon-Epoxy圆管件的静态吸能特征[J].航空学报,2005,26(2):246-249. 被引量:12
  • 2郭勤涛,张令弥,费庆国.用于确定性计算仿真的响应面法及其试验设计研究[J].航空学报,2006,27(1):55-61. 被引量:66
  • 3孙侠生.民用飞机结构适坠性评估技术现状与发展趋势[J].结构强度研究,2006(3):1-7. 被引量:7
  • 4雷正保,余进修,颜海棋,周志刚,周屏艳.基于正交试验设计的间断式砼护栏研究[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(7):13-17. 被引量:19
  • 5Lyle K H, Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Simulation of aircraft landing gears with a nonlinear dynamic finite element code[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39(1): 142 -147.
  • 6Adams A, Lankarani H M. A modern aerospace modeling approach for evaluation of aircraft fuselage crashworthiness[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2003, 8(4) : 401-413.
  • 7Byar A. A crashworthiness study of a Boeing 737 fuselage section[D]. Philadelphia: Drexel University, 2003.
  • 8Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Development of an LS-DYNA model of an ATR42-300 aircraft for crash simulation [C]//Proceedings of the 8th International LS-DYNA Users Conference. Michigan: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2004:1 -15.
  • 9Bisagni C. Crashworthiness of helicopter subfloor structures[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2002, 27(8-9): 1067-1082.
  • 10Mccarthy M A, Wiggenraad J F M. Numerical investigation of crash test of a composite helicopter subfloor structure[J]. Composite Structures, 2001, 51(4): 345-359.

共引文献31

同被引文献152

引证文献24

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部