期刊文献+

环境风险知觉的空间折扣模型 被引量:4

Spatial discount model in environmental risk perception
原文传递
导出
摘要 环境风险有着典型的空间特征,但空间距离对于风险知觉的影响机制与模式还缺乏深入研究.该研究从环境风险现实背景中提炼出科学化问题,提出了一个面向空间风险的偏好公理体系,推导出指数模式的概率-空间距离权衡关系,并用一个空间折扣模型刻画了个体的环境风险评价方式.模型表明,个体在心理上将远处的风险事件映射到近端位置,而空间距离导致一种风险感知的折扣效应,表现为个体降低了对环境后果严重性及其可能性的主观估计.该模型首次依托一般性的环境风险事件建立了空间距离与概率之间的显性联系,为空间背景下的风险研究提供了一个有用的框架.该研究也有助于理解社会个体的环境风险知觉方式,对于环境风险管理有着重要启示. Environmental risk is typically characterized by its spatial distance, while the study on the mechanism and mode of how spatial distance influence risk perception is quite limited. This paper formulated a framework from the background of environmental risk, proposed an axiomatic set of preferences and derived a proposition of probability-spatial distance tradeoff, with a form of exponential function. Finally, a spatial discount model was built to describe the manner of individuals' environmental risk assessment. The model suggests that individuals psychologically map a remote risky event into a proximate one, while the spatial distance results in a discounting effect on the estimation of the seriousness of impact as well as the possibility of its occurrence. This model contributes in explicitly formalizing the connection between probability and spatial distance based on a general environmental risk, and providing a useful framework for considering risk in a spatial context. The research also helps to understand social individuals' manners of perceiving environmental risk, which has great relevance for environmental risk management as illustrated.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2712-2717,共6页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71101035) 第49批国家博士后科学基金(20110490110) 国家环境保护部 住房和城乡建设部联合项目(2009ZX07632-03-07)
关键词 环境风险知觉 空间距离 概率-空间距离权衡 空间折扣 environmental risk perception spatial distance probability-spatial distance tradeoff spatial discount
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity[M]. London: Sage, 1992.
  • 2Gattig A, Hendrickx L. Judgmental discounting and environmental risk perception: Dimensional similarities, domain differences, and implications for sustainability[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2007, 63(1): 21 39.
  • 3赵勇,王清,陈阳.基于有限感知的决策理性模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(2):339-346. 被引量:4
  • 4Holton G A. Defining risk[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2004, 6(60): 19- 25.
  • 5Baucells M, Heukamp F. Probability and time trade-off[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(4): 831-842.
  • 6Rotter J B. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1954.
  • 7Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35: 270-284.
  • 8Halevy Y. Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect[J]. The American Economic Review, 2008, 98(3): 1145-1162.
  • 9Baucells M, Heukamp F. Common ratio using delay[J]. Theory and Decision, 2010, 68: 149-158.
  • 10Baucells M, Heukamp F, Villasis A. Trading-off probability and time: Experimental evidence[R]. IESE Business School Working Paper, 2009.

二级参考文献56

共引文献21

同被引文献77

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部