摘要
目的:比较妇科外洗方自煎剂与颗粒剂对假丝酵母菌的体外抑菌活性。方法:采用纸片扩散法(K-B)测定自煎剂与颗粒剂体外抑菌圈的直径。结果:将两种药液的抑菌圈半径的数据进行t检验,t0.05=0.0295,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:自煎剂因中药饮片批次不同与自煎方法的不确定性,较质量标准相对稳定的颗粒剂比效而言,颗粒剂的抑菌效果较为理想,且优势明显。
Objective: To compare the effects of the bacteriostatic activities in vitro against Candida albicans of homemade decoction and granules for gynecology washing treatment. Methods: To measure the diameters of the inhibited halo in vitro in homemade decoction and granules for gynecology washing treatment by Kirby-Bauer antibiotic testing (K-B). Results: Two kinds of liquid medicine of bacteriostatic ring radius datum are determined, by t-test signifi- cantly giving the probability t0.05=0.029 5(P〈 0.05). Their differences have statistical significance. Conclusion: The effect of the bacteriostatic activities of granules with relatively stable quality is more ideal and advantageous than that of homemade decoction, because of the variety of Chinese herbal medicine and the uncertainty of the homemade method.
出处
《抗感染药学》
2012年第4期287-289,共3页
Anti-infection Pharmacy
关键词
妇科外洗方
自煎剂
颗粒剂
抑菌圈直径
gynecology washing treatment
homemade decotion
granules, diameter of inhibited halo