期刊文献+

创新战略选择:竞争环境对战略纯度与企业绩效关系的调节效应 被引量:2

A Choice on Innovation Strategy:The Impact of Competitive Environment on the Relationship Between Strategic Purity and Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于207家中国企业的样本数据,实证检验竞争环境对战略纯度与绩效之间关系的影响.结果表明,战略纯度与企业绩效之间的关系依赖于企业所面临的竞争程度.当企业面临竞争程度低时,挖掘性创新与探索性创新之间的平衡能够促进组织绩效的提升,企业应当尽量平衡组织这两种创新活动;当企业面临竞争程度高时,挖掘性创新对组织绩效具有促进作用,而探索性创新对组织绩效具有损害作用,企业应该尽量减少探索性活动,同时尽量增加挖掘性活动. By the samples of 207 high and new technology enterprises in China, it conducts an empimcal test on the in- fluence of competitive environment on the effectiveness of finn's innovative strategy choice. The results show that the re- lationship between strategic purity and firm performance is moderated by competitive intensity. More specifically, the balance between explorative innovation strategy and expl0itative innovation strategy improves firms' performance when competitive and intensity is low and thus the two need to be balanced. On the contrary, the imbalance between explora- tive innovation strategy and exploitative innovation strategy improves firm performance when competitive intensity is high. Furthermore, explorative innovation strategy hinders firm performance when the competitive intensity is high. Thus, enterprises should reduce explorative activities and increase exploitative activities.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期46-52,共7页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"知识流动视角下高技术产业创新体系国际化理论与政策研究"(71173071) 高校博士点基金项目"基于知识供应链的国家创新体系科技资源配置优化研究"(20090632048)
关键词 探索性创新 挖掘性创新 战略纯度 竞争程度 企业绩效 explorative innovation exploitative innovation strategic purity competitive intensity firm performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J].Organization Science, 1991,1 ( 2 ) : 71 - 87.
  • 2Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma re- visited [ J ]. Academy of Management Review,2003,28 (2) :238 - 256.
  • 3Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and per- formance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators [J]. Management Science,2006, 52( 11 ) : 1661 - 1674.
  • 4李忆,司有和.探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(5):4-12. 被引量:151
  • 5Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal ,2004,47 (2) :209 - 226.
  • 6Zi-Lin H, Poh-kam W. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis [ J]. Or- ganization Science, 2004,15 (4) :481 - 494.
  • 7Uotila J, Maula M, Zahra S A, et al. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30 (2) : 221 - 231.
  • 8Porter M E. What is strategy? [J]. Harvard Business Review,1996,74(6) :61 -78.
  • 9Chew B. The geometry of competition [ M ]. New York: Internal Publication of the Monitor Company,2000.
  • 10孙金云.一个二元范式下的战略分析框架[J].管理学报,2011,8(4):524-530. 被引量:10

二级参考文献89

  • 1方润生,李雄诒.组织冗余的利用对中国企业创新产出的影响[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(3):15-20. 被引量:49
  • 2王辉,忻蓉,徐淑英.中国企业CEO的领导行为及对企业经营业绩的影响[J].管理世界,2006,22(4):87-96. 被引量:103
  • 3蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用——江苏与广东新兴企业的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(10):90-99. 被引量:185
  • 4Ozcan S. Examining slack - innovation relationship longitudinal evidence from US farm equipment industry( 1966 -2001 ) [ EB/OL]. Working paper: http://www, druid. dk/uploads/tx_pieturedb/ds2005 - 1497. pdf, 2005. 2007 - 12 - 07.
  • 5Rosner M. Economic determinants of organizational innovation[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1968, 12:614-625.
  • 6Murphy G B, Trailer J W, Hill R C. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36 : 17 - 29.
  • 7He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis [ J ]. Organization Science, 2004, 15:481 -494.
  • 8Cyert R, March J. The Behavioral Theory of the Firm [ M]. Englewood Cliffs (NJ) : Prentice - Hall; 1963.
  • 9Tan J, Peng M W. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24: 1249- 1263.
  • 10Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 2 : 238 -256.

共引文献227

同被引文献53

  • 1吴晓波,陈小玲,李璟琰.战略导向、创新模式对企业绩效的影响机制研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(1):118-127. 被引量:60
  • 2蒋春燕,赵曙明.社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用——江苏与广东新兴企业的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(10):90-99. 被引量:185
  • 3SONG M,WANG T,PARRY M E.Do market information processes improve new venture performance?[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(6):556-568.
  • 4ZAHRA S A,BOGNER W C.Technology strategy and software new ventures'performance:exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2000,15(2):135-173.
  • 5KATILA R,AHUJA G.Something old,something new:a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(6):1183-1194.
  • 6ROTHAERMEL F T,ALEXANDRE M T.Ambidexterity in technology sourcing:the moderating role of absorptive capacity[J].Organization Science,2009,20(4):759-780.
  • 7O'REILLY C,TUSHMAN M.Organizational ambidexterity:past,present and future[J].The Academy of Management Perspectives,2013,27(4):324-338.
  • 8STADLER C,RAJWANI T,KARABA F.Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma:networks as a new level of analysis[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2014,16(2):172-193.
  • 9BENNER M J,TUSHMAN M L.Exploitation,exploration,and process management:the productivity dilemma revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):238-256.
  • 10SINE W D,MITSUHASHI H,KIRSCH D A.Revisiting burns and stalker:formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):121-132.

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部