期刊文献+

中国大陆空间结构分异的进化 被引量:36

Evolution of land differentiation in Chinese mainland
原文传递
导出
摘要 在明确决定中国空间分异的三次本性的地理要素的基础上,以进化经济地理学的观点进一步分析三次本性在区域发展与演化的作用,发现第一本性地理要素决定了中国农业的空间锁定———即秦岭-淮河线和长城一线;随着第二本性对区域经济发展作用不断提高,原有的锁定被打破,中心城市锁定了基本空间格局,区域出现了中心腹地结构;第三本性促进区域发生结构变异,枢纽网络结构被创生出来,结构发生了突变。另外三次本性在空间上存在着路径依赖的关系,第二本性往往最初受到第一本性的推动,而第三本性往往最初受到第一本性和第二本性的推动。从宏观上而言,中国在三次产业进化过程中,胡焕庸线并没有被打破,成为中国区域发展基本的锁定。 In this paper, on the basis of three natures which determine Chinese spatial heterogene- ity, further analysis of the role of three natures on the regional development and evolution is done in the point of view of evolutionary economic geography. The first nature which determines the spatial lock of Chinese agriculture--the Line of Qinling Mountain-Huaihe River and the Great Wall plays a leading role in the first industrial revolution (Agricultural Revolution). When times transferred from the agricultural society to industrial society, the second nature composed of transportation and infrastructure increasingly contributed to the regional economic development. The original spatial lock was broken. The central cities locked the basic spatial structure. Center- Hinterland structure can be found in the region. The third nature promotes regional structural variation. The structure of Hub-Network is created. The path dependence of three natures can be observed significantly, which means the second nature is initially driven by the first nature, and the third nature is initially driven by the first and second natures. In the process of regional evo- lution, Hu Huanyong Line, which is a famous geographical boundary in China, has not been broken. The Hu Huanyong Line has become the basic lock of regional development in China.
作者 夏海斌 王铮
出处 《地理研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2123-2138,共16页 Geographical Research
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70933002)
关键词 空间分异 Krugman学说 三次本性 路径依赖 空间锁定 spatial distribution Krugman doctrine Three Natures path dependence spa tial lock
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Gregory Clark. Why isn't the whole world developed? Lessons from Cotton Mills. The Journal of Economic Histo- ry, 1987, 47(1):141-73.
  • 2Boschma R A. New industries and windows of locational opportunity. A long-term analysis of Belgium,Erdkunde, 1997,51(1): 1-19.
  • 3JonesE L. The European miracle: environment, economies, and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • 4Crosby Alfred W. Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1986.
  • 5Gallup J L, Sachs J D, Mellinger A. Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 1999, 22(2) :179-232.
  • 6Martin R. The new 'geographical turn' in economics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 23(1): 65-91.
  • 7Barnes T J. Retheorizing economic geography: From the quantitative revolution to the cultural turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001, 91(3): 546-56S.
  • 8Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 1991,99(3) : 183- 199.
  • 9Krugman P. First nature, second nature and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science, 1993,33(2) : 129 -144.
  • 10Naude Wim. Geography, transport and Africa's proximity gap. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17 (1) : 1-9.

二级参考文献72

共引文献670

同被引文献629

引证文献36

二级引证文献734

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部