期刊文献+

错误信息特征对学科领域知识丰富性不同学生学习的错误监控之影响

The Effects of Error Information Features on Error Detection Among Different Abundance of Disciplinary Domain Knowledge Students' Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Go/No-Go范式,26名中学生参与实验。考察基于主体错误反应和客体错误信息两类错误监控条件下,学科领域知识教学实验组和对照组对不同类型错误信息监控的脑电成分。结果显示,(1)错误反应监控下,实验组对要义特征错误反应诱发的ERN较字面特征的更负,对照组则相反。(2)错误信息监控下,两组学生均表现出监控字面特征错误诱发的ERN较要义特征错误的更负。(3)两种监控条件均表现出实验组的ERN波形较对照组的更负。表明:虽然两类监控条件均能诱发ERN,但影响因素不同:基于主体错误反应的监控受个体对其错误的加工深度影响;基于客体错误信息的监控受错误信息的清晰性影响。 Efficient learning requires an internal monitoring system that detects error information. Error detection plays an important role in cognitive monitoring. The aim of this study is to investigate the ERPs of the disciplinary domain knowledge teaching experiment on two kinds of error features (verbatim and gist features errors) under subjects - based error response detection and objects - based error information detection. Verbatim feature errors refer to the incorrectly written chemical expressions and gist features errors refer to the equations for chemical reactions that violate the principles of replacement reaction. Twenty- six middle school students (thirteen of them were chosen from the teaching experiment class and the rest were from the control class) participated in this ERP experiment. The Go/No - Go paradigm was used. Subjects were instructed to respond to the incorrectly written chemical expressions or the equations for chemical reactions that violated the principles of replacement reaction by pressing the Go trial'button and to withhold this response when they judged the present stimulus as correct. Recordings of the electroencephalogram were made from FCz, Fz, Cz, CPz and were referenced to the activity recorded on the left and right mastoids. Vertical EOG was recorded with tin electrodes placed above and below the left eye and horizontal EOG was recorded from electrodes lateral to each eye. All electrode impedances were below 5kΩ. The EEG and EOG were amplified by a. 10 - 30Hz bandpass and digitized with a sample rate of 500Hz. The results showed that (1) in the error response detection condition, the errorrelated negativity (ERN) amplitudes elicited by the teaching experimental group exhibited a larger negative deflection in the gist features errors situations than those of the verbatim features errors. On the contrary, the control group produced a much more negative ERN deflection for the verbatim features errors compared with the gist features errors. (2) In the error information detection condition, the verbatim features errors elicited significantly higher ERN amplitudes than the gist features errors did both in the teaching experimental group and the control group. (3) The effects of the disciplinary domain knowledge teaching experiment existed both in error response and error information detection conditions, because the teaching experiment group produced ERN components of higher amplitudes than the control group in both the verbatim features and the gist features errors. The present results indicate that, although the ERN amplitudes are significantly elicited in the error response and the error information detection conditions, their ERN effects are affected by different factors : the subjects - based error response detection is mainly modulated by the depth of error processing between subjects and the objects - based error information detection is associated with the clarity of error information.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1371-1375,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划教育学课题(BBA080049)的资助
关键词 错误监控 学科领域知识教学 字面特征与要义特征 ERN error detection, disciplinary domain knowledge teaching, verbatim and gist features, ERN
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张维,蔡笑岳,曾苑霞.学科领域知识丰富性对中学代数问题表征层次的影响[J].心理科学,2011,34(2):398-401. 被引量:8
  • 2张晓文,蔡笑岳,张维,赖淑贤.学科领域知识教学对中学生化学学习效果的影响[J].教育导刊(上半月),2011(11):34-37. 被引量:4
  • 3Bates,A. T.,Patel, T. P.,& Liddle,P. F. (2005 ). External behav-ior monitoring mirrors internal behavior monitoring: error - relatednegativity for observed errors. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19{4),281 - 288.
  • 4Chen, S. Y.,Fan, J. P.,& Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation inhypermedia leaming systems: experts vs. novices. Computers in Hu-man Behavior ’ 22, 251 - 266.
  • 5Endrass,T.,Reuter, B.,& Kathmann, N. (2007). ERP correlates ofconscious error recognition: aware and unaware errors in an antisac-cade task. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1714 - 1720.
  • 6Holroyd, C. B.,& Coles,M. G. H, (2002). The neural basis of hu-man error processing : reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the er-ror -related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4),679 - 709.
  • 7Horowitz - Kraus, T.,& Breznitz, Z. (2008). An error - detectionmechanism in reading among dyslexic and regular readers - An ERPstudy. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2238 - 2246.
  • 8Karanasiou, I. S.,Papageorgiou, C. , Tsianaka, E. T.,Matsopoulos,G. K. , Ventouras, E. M. , & Uzunoglu,N. K. (2009). Behav-ioral and brain pattern differences between acting and observing in anauditory task. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5 : 5.
  • 9O’Connell,R. G.,Dockree, P. M.,Bellgrove, M. A.,Kelly, S. P.,Hester, F , Garavan, H.,Robertson, I. H. , & Foxe, J. J.(2007 ). The role of cingulate cortex in the detection of errors withand without awareness : a high - density electrical mapping study.European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 2571 - 2579.
  • 10Olivares,E. I.,& Iglesias,J. (2008 ). Brain potentials and integrationof external and internal features into face representations. Interna-tional Journal of Psychology,68, 59 - 69.

二级参考文献16

  • 1石燕飞,肖崇好.中学生解决物理问题表征层次的实验研究[J].中央民族大学学报(自然科学版),2001,10(2):157-161. 被引量:3
  • 2喻平.不同年级中学生对数学问题表征的差异性研究[J].应用心理学,2005,11(2):110-115. 被引量:10
  • 3李同吉,吴庆麟,胡谊.学科领域专长发展的阶段观评述[J].上海教育科研,2006(1):43-46. 被引量:8
  • 4张锦坤,沈德立,臧传丽.算术应用题表征策略的眼动研究[J].心理与行为研究,2006,4(3):188-193. 被引量:10
  • 5Alibali, M. W., Phillips, K. M. O., & Fischer, A. D. (2009). Learning new problem - solving strategies leads to changes in problem representation. Cognitive Development, 24 ( 2 ), 89 - 101.
  • 6Jenkins, C., Corritore, C. L., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). Patterns of information seeking on the web: A qualitative study of domain expertise and web expertise. Information Technology and Society, 1(3), 64-89.
  • 7Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Hagemans, M. G. (2008). The influence of domain knowledge on strategy use during simulation - based inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 580 -592.
  • 8Sloutsky, V. M. , & Yarlas, A. S. (2000). Problem representation inexperts and novices: underlying processing mechanism. In L.. R. Gleitman, & A. K. Joshi (Eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference q[ the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • 9Hambriek, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive perfor- mance: An investigation of the knowledge- is- power hypothesis [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2002, 44 (4): 339- 387.
  • 10Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P.K., Woods, B.S., Duhon, K.E., & Parker, D. College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge, interest, and strategy use: a study of domain learning [J] . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1997, 22 (2): 125-146.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部