期刊文献+

人格测验的参照情境效应 被引量:3

Frame-of-Reference Effect on Personality Tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人格测验的参照情境效应是指,在一般人格测验的基础上,设置某种特定的参照情境,进而使测验的效标关联效度得以提高的现象。在过去十余年里,参照情境效应的考察重心从早期的效度证据搜集逐渐转向内部机理的探讨。研究者试图通过参照情境与效标的逻辑关联、参照情境的被试间变异及被试内变异来解释现象背后的测量学原理。在构念层面则提出"人格和角色认同层级模型",以此说明参照情境效应的人格机制问题。未来研究可从参照情境的操作范式、参照情境效应的调节机制等方面继续寻求突破。 The Frame-of-Reference (FOR) effect on personality tests refers to a kind of phenomenon that if a specific reference context is set for a plain personality test, the criterion-related validity of this test will be improved. In the past ten years, the focus of the FOR effect studies has gradually shifted from collecting validity evidence to probing its internal mechanism. The psychometric principle of the FOR effect is that various reference inconsistency in subjects' reaction courses, including the between-person variability and the within-person inconsistency of the FOR, will be reduced, when a concordant FOR matching with criterion is provided. It also reflects that the relation between the contextualized personality constructs and the relevent criterion variables is closer to nomological network. According to Wood's Personality and Role Identity Structural Model, the origin of that relation is from the mediating mechanism of "general personality →contextualized personality → role behavior". In practice, personnel assessment experts can use that conclusion, set proper FORs for personality tests, and thus improve the effectiveness of assessment tools. We see three avenues for future studies. First, on the FOR operational paradigm, researchers can incorporate the context priming paradigm into the text induction to promote ecological validity. Secondly, researchers can probe into the moderating variables of FOR, such as the individual difference variables like self-monitoring, and the cultural factor. Thirdly, future research should expand subjects, and test the FOR effect in job applicants group. Pending future studies on those aspects, one should be careful to apply any improved measures in assessment, according to the FOR effect.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1453-1458,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC190024) 湖南省教育科学"十二五"规划课题(XJK011QXL001) 湖南师范大学社会科学青年学术骨干培养计划项目(09XGG23)资助
关键词 参照情境 效标关联效度 情境化人格 工作人格 人事测评 frame-of-reference, criterion-related validity, contextualized personality, work personality, personnel assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系——对人格内涵及其中西方差异的理论与实证分析[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):543-552. 被引量:60
  • 2Baird, B. M. , & Lucas, R. E. (in press) . “-..and how about now?” :Effects of item redundancy on contextualized self - reports of person-ality. Journal of Personality.
  • 3Bing, M. N.,Whanger, J. C.,Davison, H. K.,& YanHook, J. B.(2004) . Incremental validity of the frame - of - reference effect inpersonality scale scores : A replication and extension. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 89, 150 - 157.
  • 4Bowling, N. A.,Wang, Q.,Tang, H. Y. , & Kennedy, K. D.(2010). A comparison of general and work - specific measures ofcore self - evaluations. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 76, 559 -566.
  • 5Bowling, N. A.,& Bums, G. N. (2010). A comparison of work - spe-cific and general personality measures as predictors of work and non-work criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 95 -101.
  • 6Cook, M. Jr. (2009). Personnel Selection : Adding Value Through. Peo-ple {5th ed. ). Chichester; Wiley.
  • 7Heller, D.,Watson, D.,Komar, J.,Min, J.,& Perunovic, W. Q.E. (2007). Contextualized personality : Traditional and new assess-ment procedures. Journal of Personality, 75, 1229 - 1254.
  • 8Heller, D.,Ferris, D. L. , Brown, D. J. , & Watson, D. (2009 ).The influence of work personality on job satisfaction : Incremental va-lidity and mediation effects. Journal of Personality, 77, 1051 -1084.
  • 9Hunthausen, J. M.,Tmxillo,D. M.,Bauer, T. N. , & Hammer, L.B. (2003). A field study of frame - of - reference effects on person-ality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 545 - 551.
  • 10Lievens, F.,De Corte, W.,& Schollaert, E. (2008). A closer look atthe frame - of - reference effect in personality scale scores and validi-ty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 , 268 - 279.

二级参考文献63

共引文献59

同被引文献26

  • 1钟建安,段锦云.“大五”人格模型及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):578-583. 被引量:37
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3697
  • 3金杨华,陈卫旗,王重鸣.管理胜任特征与工作绩效关系研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1349-1351. 被引量:60
  • 4陈碧云,李小平.人格测验在人事测评中的应用[J].社会心理科学,2006,21(3):48-51. 被引量:6
  • 5Viswesvaran,C.Comprehensive meta -analysis of integritytest validities: Findings and implications for personnels election andtheories of job performance [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1993(78):679-703.
  • 6Hough,L-M.,& Fumham,A. Use of personality variables inwork settings[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2002,32(2):131-170.
  • 7Frederick,P.M.,&Michael,A.C.,& Robert,L.D. Reconsideringthe use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts [J].Per-sonnel Psychology, 2007,60 : 683-729.
  • 8李原,等,译.实用心理测验与评估(原书第2版).北京:机械工业出版社,2013:147-161.
  • 9Klaus,D.K.Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling [J].Industrial and Organizational Psychology,2010,52(1): 3.
  • 10Taylor,I.A practical guide to assessment centres andselection methods: measuring competent for recruitment anddevelopment.London: Kogan,2007 : 3-5.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部