期刊文献+

全球系统重要性金融机构评定及其对中国的启示 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 "系统重要性金融机构"作为2008年金融危机后诞生的一个新概念,其实质在强调金融领域的一个老问题,即"大而不倒"。国际清算银行发布文件,提出采用规模、可替代性、关联性、复杂性和全球活跃程度五个方面来评估系统重要性金融机构;金融稳定理事会根据上述方法,发布了全球29家系统重要性金融机构名单,中国银行名列其中,加强系统重要性金融机构的监管问题是各国金融监管当局当前亟待解决的重要课题。
出处 《经济学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期71-75,共5页 Economic Perspectives
基金 国家社科基金重点项目<我国经济发展方式转型中的金融保障体系研究>(批准号10AJL005) 国家社科基金重大项目<加快推进对外经济发展方式转变研究>(批准号10ZD&017) 北京师范大学985课题"金融风险指数"的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Acharya,V. et al(2010), "M.easuring systemic risk", NYU Working Paper.
  • 2Basel Committee on Banking Supervision(2011 ), Global Sys- temically Important Banks: Assessment. Methodology and the Additional Loss Absorbency Requirement.
  • 3Brewer, E. J. Jagtiani(2007), " How much would banks be willing to pay to become "too- big- to- fail' and to cap- ture other benefits.'?", Working Paper RWP 07-05, Fed- eral Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  • 4Dean, B. M. Travis(2009), "The value of the "Too big to fail'", Big Bank Subsidy, Center for Economic and Policy Research Issue Brief.
  • 5Elliott, D. J. et a1(2011), "Identifying and regulating system- ically important financial institutions", Brookings Work- ing Paper.
  • 6FSB, IMF, BIS(2009), Guidance to Assess the Systemic Im portance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instru ments Initial Considerations Report to G20 Finance Min isters and Governors.
  • 7Segoviano, M.A. C. Goodhart(2009), "Banking stability measures", Discussion paper, London School of Eeonom- ies and Politieal Science.
  • 8Soussa, F. (2000), "Too big to fail: Moral hazard and un fair competition?", the Centre for Central Banking Stud ies, Bank of England, pp. 7-32.
  • 9Spiegel, M.M. b- N. Yamori(2000), "Financial turbulence and the Japanese main bank relationship", Working Pa- per, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
  • 10Tobias, A. 8 M. K. Brunnermeier (2011)," CoVAR" NBER Working Paper.

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部