期刊文献+

解析苏轼《范增论》及其在古代朝鲜的受容 被引量:1

An Analysis of the Evaluation of Fan Zeng Written by Su shi and Its Acceptance and Influence in Ancient Korea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 苏轼的《范增论》一文表面上是批评范增没有适时离开项羽,实则是评析项羽、范增、义帝三人之间的关系,他将义帝与范增、项羽的关系都界定为君臣关系,认为范增始终是忠于义帝的,而项羽则为逆臣。苏轼的《范增论》在古代朝鲜高丽时期、李朝时期文坛的"受容"可称为一种"叛逆式接受",这两个时期的李齐贤等七位文人强烈地批驳了苏轼的范增为人杰、范增忠于义帝、"增不去,项羽不亡"的论点,为全面认识范增这个历史人物提供了一种"他者"的独特的视角。 The essay of the Evaluation of Fan Zeng Written by Su shi,it outwardly criticizes Fan Zeng who did not leave Xiang Yu suitably,but it actually analyses the relationship among Yi Emperor Fan Zeng and Xiang Yu.Su shi defined their relationship as king and officials,he thought Fan Zeng was loyal to Yi Emperor but Xiang Yu was a betrayer.In the literary arena of the Korai period and the Yi Dynasty,the Evaluation of Fan Zeng was accepted rebelliously by the literary men in the two periods,the seven literary men strongly criticized the three views of Su shi,the first view was that Fan Zeng was an overachiever,the second view was that Fan Zeng was loyal to Yi Emperor and the third view was that if Fan Zeng had not left Xiang Yu,Xiang Yu should not have been destroyed,which offered a special perspective of the Other to comprehensively cognize the historical figure of Fan Zeng.
作者 付春明
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2012年第6期58-61,共4页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 苏轼 范增论 古代朝鲜 受容 Sushi the Evaluation of Fan Zeng ancient Korea acceptance and influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1唐宋八大家大全集编委会.唐宋八大家大全集[M].北京:中国华侨出版社,2010.
  • 2李齐贤.益斋乱稿[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第2辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,1990.
  • 3尹根寿.月汀集[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第47辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,1989.
  • 4崔有渊.玄岩遗稿[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第22辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,2006.
  • 5李瀷.星湖全集Ⅱ[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第199辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,1997.
  • 6李天辅.晋庵集[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第218辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,1998.
  • 7李献庆.艮翁集[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第234辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,1999.
  • 8洪良浩.耳溪集Ⅰ[C]//韩国文集丛刊(第241辑).首尔:民族文化推进会,2000.
  • 9李退溪.增补退溪全书[M].首尔:成均馆大学校、大东文化研究院,1978.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部