期刊文献+

比阿培南治疗恶性血液病合并感染疗效观察

Efficacy of biapenem treating infection in 134 patients with hematologic malignancies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价比阿培南治疗恶性血液病患者合并中、重度感染时的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年6月在我科住院的134例恶性血液病患者合并感染后应用比阿培南治疗的疗效。比阿培南用药剂量为0.3g每8小时1次静脉滴注,疗程3—24d。按卫生部颁发的抗菌药物临床研究指导原则判定疗效。结果比阿培南治疗本组恶性血液病合并感染的有效率为78.4%(105/134,痊愈+显效);在合并败血症19例中,16例有效;中性粒细胞绝对数在0.5X10’/L以下者,有效率达73.5%(61/83)。不良反应发生率为3.7%(4/134)。结论比阿培南治疗恶性血液病合并感染疗效显著,安全性好。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of intravenous biapenem treating infections in 134 patients with hematologic malignancy. Methods The clinical data of 134 cases of biapenem- treated infections in patients with hematologic malignancy were reviewed in department of hematology from January 2011 to June 2012. The dosage of biapenem was O. 3 g qSh for all infections. The treatment duration was 3 to 24 days. The efficacy evaluation was conducted according to the guidelines on clinical trial of antimicrobial agents released by ministry of health. Results Biapenem treatment was effective in 78.4% (105/134) of patients with hematologic malignancy. Biapenem was also effective in 16/19 cases of septicemia. Biapenem was effective in 73.5 % (61/83) of patients whose absolute neutrophils count was lower than 0.5 x 109/L. The incidence of adverse reactions was 3.7% (4/134). Conclusions Biapenem is high effective and tolerant in treating infections of patients with hematologic malignancy.
出处 《中国医药》 2012年第12期1560-1562,共3页 China Medicine
关键词 比阿培南 血液病 恶性 感染 Biapenem Hematologic, Malignancy Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献40

  • 1杨帆,赵旭,吴菊芳,周新,修清玉,施毅,沈策,刘荣玉,张伯科,钟玲,陈楠,倪兆慧,苏炳华,吴湜,张婴元.比阿培南治疗细菌性肺炎和尿路感染的多中心随机对照临床试验[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2007,7(2):73-78. 被引量:28
  • 2刘成伟,涂植光,黄文祥,余登高,李崇智,郑行萍.比阿培南和亚胺培南对呼吸道和泌尿道致病菌的体外抗菌活性比较[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(7):770-773. 被引量:14
  • 3Perry CM,Ibbotson T.Biapenem[J].Drugs,2002,62(15):2 221-2234.
  • 4Sarker SD,Nahar L,Kumarasamy Y.Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazlnin as an indicator of cell growth,and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochcmicals[J].Methods,2007,42:321-324.
  • 5Malanosld GJ,Collins L,Wennersten C,et al.In vitro actitivy of biapenem against clinical isolates of gram-positive and gramnegitive bacteria[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1993,37(9):2 009-2 016.
  • 6Tsuchimochi N, Takuma T, Shimono N, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiological analysis of clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [J]. J Infect Chemother, 2008,14(2) :99-104.
  • 7Drusano GL, Lode H, Edwards JR. Meropenem.- clinical re- sponse in relation to in vitro susceptibility[J7. Clin Microbiol Infect,2000,6 (4) :185-194.
  • 8Kiremitci A,Dinleyici EC,Erben N,et al. In vitro activity of ertapenem and other carbapenems against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in a tertiary care center in Turkey [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother,2008,9(9) :1441-1449.
  • 9Hoban D J,Jones R N,Yamane N, et al. In viuo activity of three carbapenem antibiotics. Comparative studies with biapenem (L-627), imipenem, and mempenem against aerobic pathogens isolated worldwide [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1993, 17(4):299.
  • 10Vessillier S, Docquier J D. Overproduction and biochemical characterization of the chryseobacterium meningosepticum BlaB Metallo- β - Lactamase [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2002,46 (6) : 1921.

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部