期刊文献+

组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂抗感染性休克治疗动物实验的研究进展 被引量:1

Research progress of histone deacetylase inhibitors in the theraphy of anti-sepsis shock in animal experiments
原文传递
导出
摘要 组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂作为抗肿瘤、神经退行性病变、免疫系统疾病等治疗药物已成功应用于临床。值得注意的是,其凭借促生存和抗炎特性成为新型的抗感染休克药物,能在分子水平上逆转由于感染性休克及其后续液体复苏造成的基因表达变化,重要的是对血流动力学产生影响轻微,最终阻断病变向全身炎症反应综合征和多器官衰竭综合征的发展,从而为争取治疗“黄金时问”打下了良好基础;另一方面,随着“二次打击”理论的发展,它也将架起失血性休克与感染性休克之间的桥梁,拓展了在休克领域的认识。因此,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂是对传统抗感染性休克治疗的延伸和挑战。 It has demonstrated histone deacetylase inhibitor to be protective in preclinical and early clinical studies for the therapy of cancer, central nervous system degenerative diseases and immune system diseases. Strikingly, Recent studies have shown that it has emerged as a potent prosurvival and anti-inflammatory drug, offering new lines of therapeutic intervention for sepsis shock, and can reverse the changes of genes expression at the molecular level, caused by sepsis shock and its follow-up of fluid resuscitation. What' s more, it has slight impact on hemodynamics, ultimately alleviates lesions to systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ failure syndrome and simultaneously lays a good foundation to win the golden time for treatment. On the other hand, with the development of "second hit" theory, it will also set up a bridge between hemorrhagic shock and septic shock, resulting in expansioning the breadth and depth of understanding of shock. In brief, histone deacetylase inhibitors are the extension and challenges of the traditional therapy of anti-sepsis shock.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2012年第11期770-773,共4页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂 休克 分子水平 液体复苏 动物实验 Histone deacetylase inhibitors Shock At the molecular level Fluid resuscitation Animal experimentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1MacKenzie EJ,Fowler CJ.Epidemiology[M]//Matox KL,Feliciano DV,Moore EE.Trauma.4th ed.New York:McGraw-Hill,2000:21-36.
  • 2Morley J,Kossygan K,Giannoudis PV.Damage control orthopaedies:a new concept in the management of the multiply injured patient[J].Curr Orthop,2002,16:362-367.
  • 3Angus DC,Linde-Zwirble WT,Lidicker J,et al.Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States:analysis of incidence,outcome,and associated costs of care[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1303-1310.
  • 4Houck PM,Bratzler DW,Nsa W,et al.Timing of antibiotic administration and outcomes for medicare patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia[J].Arch Intern Med,2004,164(6):637-644.
  • 5Hotchkiss RS,Karl IE.The pathophysiology and treatment sepsis[J].N Engl J Med,2003,348(2):138-150.
  • 6Levey MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC.2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31 (4):1250-1256.
  • 7Moore LJ,Moore FA,Jones SL,et al.Sepsis in general surgery:a deadly complication[J].Am J Surg,2009,198(6):868-874.
  • 8Coimbra R.From the trauma surgeon's viewpoint:multiple injuries-which cavity to open first[J].J Traunm Nurs,2005,12(1):7-9.
  • 9Destigter KK,Lefebvre SD.Imaging colorectal trauma[J].Semin Colon Rectal Surg,2004,15:80-84.
  • 10Hoff WS,Holevar M,Nagy KK,et al.Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma:the EAST practice management guidelines work group[J].J Trauma,2002,53(3):602-615.

共引文献14

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部