3Capelastegui A,Fernandez-Canton G,Fernamdez-Ruanova B,et al.The safety of magnetic resonance imaging:an analysis based on a review of incidents at the Osatek Center[J].Badiologia,2006,48:225-234.
4Hennemeyer CT,Wicklow K,Feinberg DA,et al.In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model:safety issues and artifacts[J].Radiology,2001,219:732-737.
5Shafiei F,Honda E,Takabashi H,et al.Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging[J].J Dent Res,2003,82:602-606.
6Weishaupt D,Quick HH,Nanz D,et al.Ligating dips for three-dimensional MR angiography at 1.5 T:in vitro evaluation[J].Radiology,2000,214:902-907.
7Hahnel S,Nguyen-Trong TH,Rohde S,et al.3.0 Tesla contrastenhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents:in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla[J].J Neuroradiol,2006,33:75-80.
8Matsuura H,Inoue T,Ogasawara K.et al.Quantitative analysis ofmagnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials:comparison of 0.5,1.5,and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields[J].Neurol Med Chit (Tokyo),2005,45:395-398.
9Destine D,Mizutani H,Igarashi Y,et al.Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper[J].Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi,2008,52:205-210.
10Starcukova J,Starcuk Z Jr,Hubakova H,et al.Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts[J].Dent Mater,2008,24:715-723.
