期刊文献+

单侧椎弓根固定联合单枚椎间融合器经椎间孔椎体间融合术后对侧腰骶部疼痛(英文) 被引量:8

Postoperative back pain of opposite lumbosacral area attribute to unilateral fixation with diagonal cage-instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨单侧椎弓根固定联合单枚椎间融合器经椎间孔椎体间融合术后对侧腰部疼痛原因及发生率。[方法]2008年10月~2011年10月,30例资料完整的患者(男16例,女14例,年龄40~56岁)行单侧椎弓根固定联合单枚椎间融合器行经椎间孔椎体间融合术。分析术前及术后ODI评分及VSA评分,通过术后影像学表现分析椎间高度及对侧关节突情况。[结果]术前及术后3、6、12个月ODI评分、VSA评分有统计学意义(P<0.05)。融合率为92%,临床满意率为89%,3例患者术后出现对侧腰骶部疼痛。[结论]单侧固定术后椎间高度恢复不对称及对侧关节紊乱应引起重视,应严格限制手术适应证。 [ Objective] The purpose of this study was to explore the possible causes and incidence of the postoperative back pain in the opposite lumbosacral area. [ Methods] Form October 2008 to October 2011, thirty consecutive patients (16 men and 14 women with age ranged from 40 to 56 years) underwent diagonal cage-instrumented lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral fixation. Pre-and postoperative scores measured by Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were ana- lyzed. Fusion status, condition of intervertebral height and oposite facets were investigated with X-ray and CT scans. [ Rusults ] Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) showed statistical significance between perioperation and 3 months,6 months, 12 months postoperatively(P 〈 0.05). The fusion rates were 92%, The clinical results were 89% satisfacto- ry,three patients complained postoperative back pain in the opposite lumbosacral area. [ Conclusion] Due attention should pay to the postoperative back pain arised from the restore intervertebral height asymmetryly and the oposite facets dsyfunction. The operation indications must be strictly defined and long-term clinical studies are required.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第24期2260-2263,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 单侧 内固定 腰椎椎体间融合 椎弓根 术后腰骶部疼痛 unilateral, fixation, lumbar interbody fusion, pedicle screw fixation, postoperative back pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mao L, Shen YX, Wang L. Clinical therapeutic progress of discogenic low back pain [ J ]. China Orthop J,2007,1,39 - 41.
  • 2Bumeikiene S, Nelson EL, Mason A, et al. Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pos- terior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative seoli- osis and spinal stenosis[ J]. Surg Neurol Int,2012 ,3 :25.
  • 3Audat Z, Moutasem O, Yousef K,et al. Comparison of clinical and ra- diological resuhs of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine [ J ]. Singap Med J, 2012,3 : 183 - 187.
  • 4Fang X, Fan S, Zhao X. Application of transforaminal lumbar inter- body fusion in old thoracolumbar fracture and dislocation [ J ]. J Spinal Cord Med,2011,6:612 -615.
  • 5Jang KS,Kim HS,Ju CI,et al. Paraspinal muscle sparing versus per- cutaneous screw fixation:a prospective and comparative study for the treatment of L5 - S1 spondylolisthesis [ J ]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2011,3 : 163 - 166.
  • 6Chen L, Yang H, Tang TS. Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treatedwith posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2005,19 : 2171 - 2175.
  • 7Goe| V K, Lira TH, Gwon J,et al. Effects of rigidity of an internal fixa- tion device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation [ J 1. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1991,3 : 155 - 161.
  • 8Kabins MB, Weinstein JN,Spratt KF,et al. Isolated L4 - L5 fusions u- sing the variable screw placement system: unilateral versus bilateral [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 1992,5:39 -49.
  • 9Suk KS, 12e HM, Kim Nit, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) , 2000,29 : 367 - 375.
  • 10Moreland DB,Asch HL, Czajka GA, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion:comparison of single inter'ertebral cage and single side pediele screw fixation versus bilateral cages and screw fixation[ Jj. Minim In- vasive Neurosurg,2009,52 : 132 - 136.

同被引文献50

  • 1毛路,杨惠林,王根林.单侧椎弓根螺钉固定在腰椎退行性疾病临床应用进展[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(21):6368-6370. 被引量:4
  • 2陆声,徐永清,丁自海,钟世镇,侯东升,李忠华.经皮椎板关节突螺钉固定的应用解剖及影像学研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(5):351-352. 被引量:9
  • 3毛路,沈忆新,王磊.椎间盘源性下腰痛临床治疗研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(1):39-41. 被引量:21
  • 4蔡宏歆,范顺武,赵凤东.腰椎椎间融合术后融合评价方法与标准[J].国际骨科学杂志,2007,28(1):22-25. 被引量:19
  • 5毛路,刘栋,郝剑,沈忆新.腰椎动力固定装置治疗下腰痛的研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(3):262-264. 被引量:8
  • 6Fernández-Fairen M,Sala P,Ramírez H,et al. A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(4):395-401.
  • 7Moreland DB,Asch HL,Czajka GA,Posterior lumbar interbody fusion:comparison of single intervertebral cage and single side pedicle screw fixation versus bilateral cages and screw fixation[J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg,2009,52(3):132-136.
  • 8Aoki Y,Yamagata M,Nakajima F,et al. Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a report of three patients[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009,34(1):E54-58.
  • 9Sethi A,Lee S,Vaidya R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw[J]. Eur Spine J,2009,18(3):430-434.
  • 10Harris BM,Hilibrand AS,Savas PE,et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2004,29(4):65-70.

引证文献8

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部