期刊文献+

股骨颈骨折不愈合高危因素的回顾性研究 被引量:23

A retrospective analysis of high risk factors for nonunion of femoral neck fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对股骨颈骨折术后不愈合的患者进行回顾性分析,探讨股骨颈骨折不愈合的高危因素。方法查阅2003年1月-2011年1月采用空心加压螺钉内固定治疗的股骨颈骨折患者1323例,其中资料完整且符合纳入标准患者965例。应用Logistic多元回归方法分别对患者年龄、性别、致伤机制(是否高能量损伤)、骨折类型(有无移位)、内科合并症[美国麻醉协会生理评分(American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Score, ASAS)分级]等5种因素与骨折愈合的关系进行统计学分析,得出股骨颈骨折不愈合的高危因素。结果对影响股骨颈骨折愈合的因素进行定量测定依次为:内科合并症(ASAS分级)、致伤机制(是否高能量损伤)、骨折类型(有无移位)、性别、年龄。结论年龄〉50岁、女性、骨折移位、高能量损伤、ASASm级以上是股骨颈骨折不愈合的高危因素。 Objective To retrospectively study postoperative nonunion of femoral neck fractures so as to identify high risk factors for their nonunion. Methods A total of 965 patients with complete clinical data out of the 1 323 patients with femoral neck fractures treated by internal fixation with cannulated compression screws from January 2003 to January 2011 were included in the study. Logistic multiple regression method was used to analyze five factors including patients' age, gender, injury mechanism (whether high energy injury or not), fracture type (with or without displacement) and medical comorbidities [ American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Score (ASAS) grade ] and their correlation with fracture healing to investigate the high risk factors for the nonunion of femoral neck fractures. Results Quantitative assay of the factors affecting healing of femoral neck fractures was ranged as follows : medical comorbidities (ASAS grade) , injury mechanism (whether high energy injury or not) , fracture type (with or without displacement), gender and age. Conclusion Age 〉 50 years, females, displacement fracture, high energy injury, and ASAS grade above Ⅲ are high risk factors for nonunion of femoral neck fractures.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1083-1087,共5页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 股骨颈骨折 内固定器 骨折 不愈合 危险因素 Femoral neck fractures Internal fixators Fractures, nonunited Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1张英泽;吴文娟;吴昊天.股骨近端骨折[A]北京:人民卫生出版社,2009155-170.
  • 2Frihagen F,Nordsletten L,Madsen JE. Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures:randomised controlled trial[J].British Medical Journal,2007,(7632):1251-1254.
  • 3Lu-Yao GL,Keller RB,Littenberg B. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck.A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports[J].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1994,(01):15-25.
  • 4Rajan DT,Parker MJ. Does the level of an intracapsular femoral fracture influence fracture healing after internal fixation? A study of 411 patients[J].Injury.British Journal of Accident Surgery,2001,(01):53-56.
  • 5Str(o)mqvist B,Hansson LI,Nilsson LT. Hook-pin fixation in femoral neck fractures.A two-year follow-up study of 300 cases[J].Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,1987,(218):58-62.
  • 6Swiontkowski MF. Femoral neck fracture[A].Philadelphia:WB Saunders,1992.1384-1442.
  • 7LeCroy CM,Rizzo M,Gunneson EE. Free vascularized fibular bone grafting in the management of femoral neck nonunion in patients younger than fifty years[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2002,(07):464-472.doi:10.1097/00005131-200208000-00004.
  • 8Protzman RR,Burkhalter WE. Femoral-neck fractures in young adults[J].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1976,(05):689-695.
  • 9Swiontkowski MR,Winquist RA,Hansen ST Jr. Fractures of the femoral neck in patients between the ages of twelve and forty-nine years[J].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1984,(06):837-846.
  • 10Su Y,Chen W,Zhang Q. An irreducible variant of femoral neck fracture:a minimally traumatic reduction technique[J].Injury.British Journal of Accident Surgery,2011,(02):140-145.

二级参考文献36

  • 1中国健康促进基金会骨质疏松防治中国白皮书编委会.骨质疏松症中国白皮书.中华健康管理学杂志,2009,3(3):148-156.
  • 2Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, et al. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture: a prospective study ira geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995(310): 150-159.
  • 3Bonar SK, Tinetti ME, Speechley M, et al. Factors associated with short-versus long-term skilled nursing facility placement among community-living hip fracture patients. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1990, 38: 1139-1144.
  • 4Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, et al. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984 (186) : 45-56.
  • 5Hall SF. A user's guide to selecting a comorbidity index for clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59: 849-855.
  • 6Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating eomorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol, 2010, 11: 203-209.
  • 7Davenport DL, Bowe EA, Henderson WG, et al. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk factors can be used to validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA PS)levels. Ann Surg, 2006, 243: 636-644.
  • 8White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1987, 69: 1335-1340.
  • 9Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, et al. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth, 1996, 77: 217-292.
  • 10Robinson CM, Saran D, Annan IH. Intracapsular hip fractures. Resuits of management adopting a treatment protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994(302): 83-91.

共引文献16

同被引文献278

引证文献23

二级引证文献282

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部