期刊文献+

崛起国如何与霸权国争夺小国?——基于古代东亚历史的案例研究 被引量:24

How Did a Rising Power Compete with a Hegemonic Power for a Small State?——Case Studies from the History of Ancient East Asia
原文传递
导出
摘要 自1945年以来,大国相互间的战争变得异常稀少和困难,这一变化使得崛起国与霸权国权力竞争的主要方式由此前的军事征服和霸权战争转变为通过结盟的形式给小国提供诸如安全保障这样的好处,以此换取小国在政治和安全问题上对自己的支持和追随。在霸权国不断巩固和扩大其盟友阵营,以挤压崛起国潜在盟友数量的情况下,崛起国能否成功崛起并最终赢得国际政治主导权的关键,在于它能否从霸权国手中争夺到追随自己的盟国。作者通过详细分析辽国与北宋争夺高丽以及后金与明朝争夺朝鲜这两个古代东亚的案例,对崛起国如何与霸权国争夺小国这个问题进行了初步的探究。理论分析和经验考察都表明,作为目前主流战略思想的利益交换策略,并不足以帮助崛起国争夺到小国。而包括威慑和胁迫在内的强制性策略的适当使用,更有可能实现这一目的。这种策略的核心是要让霸权国和小国分别意识到,它们阻挠和拒绝崛起国相关诉求所遭到的损失会大于它们不这样做时的损失。 Due to the fact that war between great powers has become almost unlikely since the Second World War, the mode of power competition between rising powersand hegemonic powers since 1945 has essentially changed from military subjugation and hegemonic war into providing benefits such as security guarantees to small states in exchange for their support and obedience on political and security issues. In order to preserve its unipolar status, a hegemonic power would therefore preventively cement and expand its alliance camp so as to squeeze the number of a rising power’s potential allies. Under such a circumstance, whether the rising power would successfully rise or ultimately win the dominance on international politics relied on if it could win over small states as its allies who were heretofore in the hegemonic power’s camp. This article performs a tentative research on how a rising power competes for small states with a hegemonic state by elaborately investigating two cases from ancient East Asian history. Theoretical analysis and empirical studies both suggest that coercive strategies including deterrence and compellence are highly likely necessary conditions for the rising power to win over small states,while the strategy of interest exchange, as the mainstream strategic idea,may be futile to achieve the purpose. The key of the coercive strategy is to make the hegemonic power and the small states respectively realize that their obstruction and resistance would cost themselves even more.
作者 杨原
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期26-52,156-157,共27页 World Economics and Politics
基金 王雪莲教育基金
关键词 崛起国 权力转移 霸权 联盟 古代东亚 competing for small states,era of great power peace,power transition, rising strategy,the ancient East Asian history
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献176

  • 1杨原.武力胁迫还是利益交换?——大国无战争时代大国提高国际影响力的核心路径[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2011,28(4):96-116. 被引量:24
  • 2唐世平.理解中国的安全战略[J].国际政治研究,2002,23(3):128-135. 被引量:5
  • 3刘丰.均势为何难以生成?——从结构变迁的视角解释制衡难题[J].世界经济与政治,2006(9):36-42. 被引量:17
  • 4Kathleen Thelen, How htstitutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 5Kevin Ford, Neal Schmitt, Susan Schechtman, Brian Huhs, and Mary Doherty, "Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions," Organizational Behavior and tluman Decision Processes, Vol.43, No.1, 1989, pp. 75-117.
  • 6Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science, p. 226.
  • 7Alexander George and Timothy McKeown, "Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making," in Robert Coulam and Richard Smith, eds., Advances in htformation Processing in Organizations, Vol. 2, Greenwich: JAI Press, 1985, p. 35.
  • 8Alexander George, "The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The 'Operational Code' Belief System, " in Lawrence Falkowski, ed. , Psychological Models in International Politics, Boulder: Westview Press, 1979, pp.95-124.
  • 9Alexander George and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science, p. 206.
  • 10John Gerring, Case Stud)" Research: Principles and Practices, p. 173.

共引文献131

同被引文献456

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部