WTO贸易救济机制的设计与运行

WTO Trade Remedy Mechanism: Design and Its Operation

机制设计理论给WTO贸易救济机制的设计带来了重要启示。WTO现行贸易救济机制的设计存在漏缺、歧义和冲突,其运行产生了多种效应。WTO典型成员贸易救济机制的设计与WTO贸易救济制度的规定相比,都有其一致与不一致的方面,各国的基本立场是立足于国内产业保护,但欧美的规则对WTO规则的突破更大。相比而言,中国运行贸易救济措施态度最为谨慎,准确率最高,其次为印度,再次为欧盟,美国态度最为随意,准确率最低。中国贸易救济机制的设计和运行应在明确目标的基础上采取相应策略进行完善。

The mechanism design theories provide inspiration for WTO trade remedy mechanisms. The design of the current WTO trade remedy mechanism is plagued with drawbacks, ambiguities and conflicts, and its operation has resulted in a variety of effects. The design of Typical WTO Members＇ trade remedy mechanism have its consistency and inconsistency with the provisions of WTO trade remedy system, whose starting points are based on domestic industries protection. However, rules of European countries and US have great breakthroughs in WTO rules. In contrast, the attitude of China to run and manage trade remedy measures is the most prudent one with the highest accuracy, followed by India, and EU, and the attitude of US is the most random one with the lowest accuracy. The design and operation of Chinese trade remedy mechanism should take the appropriate strategy based on clear objectives for improvement.