期刊文献+

美国基础教育中“课程实施调查”模式与启示——学业评价与课堂教学一致性的视角 被引量:1

The Model of Curriculum Implementation Investigation in American Basic Education—From the Perspective of Alignment between Achievement Assessment and Classroom Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国在基于标准的教育改革的背景下,从改善教师课堂教学质量出发,致力于研制学业评价与课堂教学一致性分析工具,即"课程实施调查"模式。"课程实施调查"模式的框架性内容包括两方面:一是"课程实施调查"基本程序,即界定描述教学内容的同一语言及确定描述教学内容与认知要求的"维度";二是"课程实施调查"的具体方法,即确定二维矩阵的一致性指数及分析结果的呈现方式。 Under the background of the educational reform based on standards,in order to improve the classroom teaching quality,the United States try to developing the analytic tool of the alignment between academic evaluation and classroom teaching,which is named as model of curriculum implementation investigation.The model includes two parts,firstly,the basic procedure of curriculum implementation survey,which means to define the same language for the description of the teaching content and determine the dimension of the description of the teaching content and cognitive requirements,secondly,the specific methods for curriculum implementation survey,which means the confirmationof the consistency index for two-dimensional matrix and the ways of the presentation for the results.
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期54-59,共6页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 “课程实施调查” 学业评价 课堂教学 一致性 curriculum implementation investigation achievement assessment classroom teaching alignment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Poter.How SEC Measures Alignment[J].Educational Researcher, 1997, (5):9-12.
  • 2National Excellence:Acase for developing Americas Talent [EB/DL].http:llwww.ed.gov/pibslDevTalent/Toc.html,2012-07-25.
  • 3[美]国家研究理事会.美国国家科学教育标准[S].戴守志译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.56.121.
  • 4刘学智.论评价与课程标准一致性的建构:美国的经验[J].全球教育展望,2006,35(9):35-39. 被引量:30
  • 5Andrew C. Porter & Jhon L. Smithson.Alignment of Assessment.standards and Instinction Using [R].Curriculum Indicator AERA, 1999.1.
  • 6Surveys of Enacted State Collaborativeon Assessment and Student Standards Curriculum [EB/ OL] .http://seconline.weeruw.org/resources.asp.sec=http://wceruw.org/searchResults, 2012-08-11.
  • 7Porter. How SEC Measures Alignment[J].Educational Researcher, 1997,(2):9-12.
  • 8Andrew C. Porter. Measuring the content of instruction:Uses in Rearch and Practice[J]. Educational Researcher,2002,31 (7) :3-14.
  • 9PeterW.Airan.课堂评估:理论与实践[M].徐士强,等译.上海:华东师范大学出版社.2008.159.

二级参考文献4

  • 1胡军.学生学习成果评价标准不能在课程标准中缺失——澳大利亚科学课程内容与标准给我们的启示[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(9):12-17. 被引量:21
  • 2U. S. congress. (1994). House of Representatives Improving Americans Schools Actwashington. DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. 8
  • 3Norman L. Webb. (1997). Criteria for Alignment of Expectation and Assessment in Maths and Science Education. National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin - Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers Washington. DC, 22
  • 4Norman L . Webb. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards. National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin - Madison, 11 - 18.

共引文献47

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部