期刊文献+

鲍曼不动杆菌1433株对碳青霉烯类药物的耐药情况分析 被引量:5

Analysis of the resistance of 1433 strains of Acinetobacter baumanii to carbapenems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对1433株鲍曼不动杆菌对碳青霉烯类药物的耐药情况进行分析,为临床治疗提供参考。方法:对我院2008-2011年自临床标本分离出的1433株非重复鲍曼不动杆菌药敏情况进行回顾性分析,用梅里埃Vitek2分析仪对菌株进行测定及药敏实验,碳青霉烯类包括亚胺培南和美洛培南两种药物,用Whonet5.5软件分析数据,按CLSI2011年版判读药敏结果,统计学处理采用χ2检验。结果:2008-2011年对亚胺培南和美洛培南的总耐药率分别为27.5%,32.5%,37.0%和38.2%;对亚胺培南的耐药率分别为27.9%,32.4%,37.2%和38.6%;对美洛培南的耐药率分别为27.1%,32.7%,36.9%和37.8%。2011年494株鲍曼不动杆菌有4株表现为对亚胺培南耐药,美洛培南敏感,占当年总株数的0.01%。结论:2008-2011年鲍曼不动杆菌对亚胺培南和美洛培南的耐药率有逐年增加的趋势。 Objective To investigate the resistance of 1 433 strains of Acinetobacter baumanii (A. baumannii) strains to carbapenems. Methods A total of 1 433 clinical isolates of non-duplicate A. baumannii were collected from 2008-2011. The susceptibility testing of A. baumannii to imipenem and meropenem were carried out by means of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and by Vitek2 automated microbial identification system. The data were analyzed by WHO-net 5.5 software based on CLSI 2011 breakpoint. Results The resistant rates of A. baumannii to imipenem and meropenem in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were 27.9%, 32.4%, 37.2%, 38.6%, respectively, and 27.1%, 32.7%, 36.9%, 37.8%, respectively. 4 of 494 strains (0.01%) of A.baumannii in 2011 were resistant to imipenem and susceptible to meropenem. Conclusion The resistant rates of A.baumannii to carbapenems were increased gradually from 2008 to 2011.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第24期4166-4168,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 鲍曼不动杆菌 碳青霉烯类 耐药性 Acinetobacter baumannii Carbapenems Resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献60

共引文献198

同被引文献41

  • 1王刚,黄洁,秦帅,汤耀卿.不同抗菌药物对ICU泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染的疗效比较[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(1):111-114. 被引量:22
  • 2龙军,周韶松,彭永正,林裕锋.肺炎克雷伯菌随机扩增多态性DNA的分子流行病学研究[J].热带医学杂志,2007,7(4):330-331. 被引量:6
  • 3Thom KA, Johnson JK, Lee MS, et al. Environmental con-tamination because of multidmg-resistant Acinetobacterbaumannii surrounding colonized or infected patients [ J].Am J Infect Control,2011,39(9) :711 -715.
  • 4Michalopoulos A,Falagas ME,Karatza DC,et al. Epidemio-logic ,clinical characteristics,and risk factors for adverseoutcome in multiresistant gram-negative primary bacteremiaof critically ill patients [ J]. Am J Infect Control,2011,39(5):396-400.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. PerformanceStandards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S]. Tween-ty-first informational Supplement ,2011,31(1) :M100 -S21.
  • 6Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB,et al. Multidrug-resistant ,extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistantbacteria : an international expert proposal for interim stand-ard definitions for acquired resistance [ J ] . Clin MicrobiolInfect,2012,18(3) :268 -281.
  • 7ZEXUN L,DAVID L,ANDREW S. Identifying Host Sources of Fecal Pollution:Diversity of Escherichia coli in Confined Dairy and Swine Production Systems[J].{H}APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY,2005,(10):5992-5998.
  • 8LIAO C H,SHENG W H,CHEN Y C. Predictive value of the se rum bactericidal test for mortality in patients infected withmultidrug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii[J].Infect,2007,(53):260-263.
  • 9SOUZA A V,MOREIRA C R,PASTERNAK J. Characterizing uncommon Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from an outbreak in a haemodialysis unit[J].Med Microbial,2004,(10):999-1005.
  • 10PETTIGREW M M,FOXMAN B,ECEVIT Z. Use of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis,Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Typing,and Automated Ribotyping To Assess Genomic Variability among Strains of Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae[J].{H}Clinical Microbiology,2002,(02):660-662.

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部