摘要
目的:比较Beckman-Coulter Access免疫分析仪和强生VITROS-5600全自动干化学分析仪的两种敏感cTnI检测结果有无差异,了解两者之间的线性关系及相关程度。方法:收集本院急诊胸痛入院患者45例血清,分别用Beckman-Coulter Access免疫分析仪和强生VITROS-5600全自动干化学分析仪测定血清cTnI的浓度,比较两者之间的差异,并分析其相关性。结果:cTnI用这两种方法测得的结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),组存在显著相关性(P<0.05)。结论:本实验室采用的这两种敏感cTnI的检测结果一致性较好。
Objective：To comparise results of serum cardiac troponin I by Beckman-Coulter Access Immunoassay analyzer and Johnson VITROS-5600 fully automated dry chemistry analyzer,and exploring the differences as well as the linear relationship and correlation between the two.Method：45 serum samples were collected from patients presenting symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. The concentrations of serum cardiac troponin I were measured with Beckman-Coulter Access Immunoassay analyzer and Johnson VITROS-5600 fully automated dry chemistry analyzer. Data were processed by SPSS13.0 statistical analysis software.Result：Results of serum cardiac troponin I using the two methods showed no significant difference（P0.05）, while analysis shows the significant relation between the two methods （P0.05）.Conclusion：Results of sensitive cTnI in serum are detected by two instruments possessed high concordance.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2012年第33期87-88,共2页
Medical Innovation of China
