期刊文献+

Pentacam眼前节分析系统对早期圆锥角膜前后表面曲率及高度的研究 被引量:4

Research on anterior and posterior corneal curvature and elevation of keratoconus with Pentacam
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用Pentacam眼前节分析系统测得的角膜前后表面曲率、高度参数来探讨正常角膜与临床期圆锥角膜和亚临床期圆锥角膜的关系,以及Pentacam眼前节分析系统在圆锥角膜诊断中的作用。方法回顾性病例系列。选取临床期圆锥角膜患者16例(16只眼),亚临床期圆锥角膜19例(19只眼),对照组56例(56只眼)正常人群。每例患者选取一只眼,将Pentacam眼前节分析系统测得角膜前后表面曲率和前后表面高度参数进行差异检验以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,初步筛选出有用参数,进一步进行偏最小二乘(PLS)分析,确定出最终诊断模型,并利用ROC曲线方法对模型作出评价。结果相对于正常患者,临床期患者与亚临床期患者的角膜前后表面曲率、高度参数有明显的变化。ROC曲线分析显示所有参数对于将圆锥角膜从正常眼中区分出来有较高的预测精准度。应用PLS进行变量筛选并将VIP大于1.0的11个参数建立模型可以有效的将临床期圆锥角膜眼或亚临床期圆锥角膜眼从正常眼中区分出来。结论由Pentacam眼前节分析系统测得的角膜前后表面的曲率、高度参数可以有效地将圆锥角膜从正常角膜中区分出来,并且能作为疾病分期的诊断工具。 Objective To evalute the anterior and posterior corneal curvature and elevation parameters provided by Scheimpflng device ,which can effectively discriminated between subclinical keratoconus, keratoconns eyes, and normal eyes and to determin which acts on the diagnosis of keratoconus. Methods Retrospective case series. Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with clinical keratoconus, 19 eyes of 19 patients with subclinical keratoconus, and 56 eyes of 56 normal subjects. One eye from each patient was examined, the anterior and posterior corneal curvature and elevation parameters are provided by Scheimpflng device. The Mann-Whitney test, receiver-operating-characteristic { ROC ) curves, and Partial Least Squares { PLS ) were used to compare the mean measurements and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters or con- structed models. Results All of the parameters which are composed of anterior and posterior corneal curvature and eleva- tion have mere significant changes in eyes with subclinical or clinical keratoconus than in normal eyes ( P 〈 0.05 ). The ROC curve analysis showed high overall predictive accuracy of all of the parameters in discriminating ectatic corneas from normal corneas. Partial Least Squares ( PLS ) analysis showed that the goodness of fit of a medel using a combination of 11 parameters of the corneal anterior surface was best in discriminating keratoconus or subclinical keratoconus eyes from normal eyes. Conclusion Posterior and anterior elevation, and curvature parameters measured by the Pentacam camera can effectively discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas serving as a useful diagnostic tool for disease staging.
出处 《临床眼科杂志》 2012年第6期496-499,共4页 Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
基金 科技创新人才研究专项资金项目(项目编号:2011RFXYS051)
关键词 圆锥角膜 PENTACAM 高度 曲率 Keratoconus Pentacam Elevation Curvature
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol, 1998,42:297.
  • 2AmoilsSP, DeistMB, Gous P, AmoilsPM. latrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4. 0 to-7. 0 diopters of myopia..l Cataract Refract Surg, 2000, 26:967-977.
  • 3Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stuhing RD, et al. Keratoeonus and corneal eetasia after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 : 2035 -2038.
  • 4Wi|son SE, Lin DTC, KlyceSD, et al. Topographic changes in contact lens-induced cornealwarpage. Ophthalmology, 1990, 97 : 734-744.
  • 5Rabinowitz YS. Corneal topography. Bennett ES, WeissmanBA, eds. Clinical contact lens practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2005:215- 232.
  • 6Quisling S,Sjoberg s,Zimmerman B,et al. Comparison of Pentae- am and Orbscan Ilz On posterior curvature topography measure- ments in keratoeonus eyes. Ophthalmology,2006,113 : 1629-1632.
  • 7Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U,et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the pentaeam seheimpflug system-optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract ,2005,31:1729-1735.
  • 8de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L,et al. Sensitivity and spe- cificity of posterior elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminat- ing keratoconus/subclinieal keratoconus. Ophthalmology, 2008, 115 : 1534-1539.

同被引文献56

  • 1谢立信,高华.准分子激光角膜切削术治疗圆锥角膜行角膜表层镜片术后的屈光不正[J].中华眼科杂志,2007,43(3):228-232. 被引量:10
  • 2Dastjerdi MH, Hashemi H. A quantitative corneal topography index for detection of keratoconus[J]. J Refract Surg,1998,14 (4) :427-436.
  • 3Shetty R, Arora V, Jayadev C, et al. Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei,2014,55(8) :5263-5268.
  • 4Bae GH, Kim JR, Kim CH, et al. Corneal topographic and tomographie analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentaeam[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2014,157 (1) : 103-109.
  • 5Yeniad B, Yilmaz S, Bilgin LK. Evaluation of the microstructure of cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy in contact lens wearing and non-contact lens wearing keratoconus patients[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye,2010,33(4):167-170.
  • 6Touboul D, Benard A, Mahmoud AM, et al. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer:curve analysis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2011,37(12):2144- 2150.
  • 7Galletti JG, Pfortner T, Bonthoux FF. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor[J]. J Refract Surg, 2012,28 (3) : 202-208.
  • 8Fontes BM, Jr Ambrosio R, Velarde GC, et al. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases[J]. Arq Bras Oftalmol,2011,74(1): 13-16.
  • 9Chen S, Huang J, Wen D, et al. Measurement of central :omeal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound 3achymetry[J]. Acta Ophthalmol,2012,90(5):449-455.
  • 10Ambekar R, Jr Toussaint KC, Wagoner JA. The effect of keratoconus on the structural, mechanical, and optical properties of the cornea[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,2011,4(3):223-236.

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部