期刊文献+

The Accounting and Economic Effects of Currency Translation Standards: AASB 1012 vs. AASB 121

The Accounting and Economic Effects of Currency Translation Standards: AASB 1012 vs. AASB 121
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper1 empirically examines the accounting and the economic effects of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the oil and gas industry under the former and the current translation accounting standards in Australia. Due to the unique features of the oil and gas industry and based on an analysis of the former standard-Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) 1012, the authors predict that a positive translation adjustment (the accounting effect) is associated with a loss, instead of a creation of the firm value (the economic effect) under AASB 1012. The authors also predict that the new standard AASB 121, adapted from the International Accounting Standard (IAS) 21 with modifications, will report translation adjustments that are consistent with the economic effects. By using Australia-based multinational oil and gas firms, the authors find that translation adjustments under AASB 1012 are inversely associated with firm value and that the relationship changes to a positive one under AASB 121. This study concludes that the new standard has the potential to improve the quality of the translation accounting information.
机构地区 Griffith University
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2012年第11期1601-1610,共10页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 foreign currency translation translation gain/loss value relevance oil and gas industry 会计准则 经济效应 标准 天然气行业 货币 澳大利亚 天然气公司 公司价值
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Aggarwal, R. (1981). Exchange rates and stock prices: A study of the US capital markets under floating exchange rates. Akron Business and Economic Review, 12, 7-12.
  • 2Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-178.
  • 3Bartov, E. (1997). Foreign currency exposure of multinational firms: Accounting measures and market valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 263-652.
  • 4Beaver, W. H., & Wolfson, M. (1984). Foreign currency translation gains and losses. Financial Analysis Journal, 40(2), 28-50.
  • 5Collins, D., & Salatka, W. (1993). Noisy accounting earnings signal and earnings response coefficients: The case of foreign currency accounting. Contemporary A cc ounting Research, 10(1), 119-159.
  • 6Collins, D. W., Rozeff, M. S., & Dhaliwal, D. S. (1981). The economic determinations of the market reaction to proposed mandatory accounting changes in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(1), 37-71.
  • 7Condon, T., Corbo, V., & De Melo, J. (1990). Exchange rate based disinflation, wage rigidity, and capital inflows: Tradeoffs for Chile 1977-1981. Journal of Development Economics, 32(1), 113-131.
  • 8Corbo, V. (1985). International prices, wages, and inflation in an open economy: A Chilean model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 564-573.
  • 9Eiteman, D. K., Stonehill, A., & Moffett, M. (2000). International finance management (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
  • 10FASB. (1981). Foreign currency translation. Summary of statement No. 52. Stamford, CT: FASB.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部