期刊文献+

Review of Nie Minli's Being and Substance: On AdstoUe's Metaphysics Z1- 9

Review of Nie Minli's Being and Substance: On AdstoUe's Metaphysics Z1- 9
原文传递
导出
摘要 In his new book Being and Substance: A Study of Aristotle's Metaphysics Z1-9, Nie Minli, taking a holistic perspective, argues that the primary substance--that is, the individual in Categories--is identical to form, which is the primary substance in Metaphysics Z, and that Z3 has finished arguing what the real candidate of substance is and the inserted Z7-9 texts are the "core and key" of the entire book. In spite of his excellent scholarship and masterful interpretation of Metaphysics Z4-6, Z7, Categories 1-5 and Physics A, Nie offers insufficient textual support for his interpretation of the primary substance in Metaphysics Z and the content of Z3. Although substance is the subject (hypokeimenon) and a "this" (tode ti) in Categories, it is the ultimate subject (hypokeimenon eschaton) and a "this" (tode ti) and separable (choriston) in Metaphysics. As the ultimate subject, substance is form and matter but not the individual. As a "this" (tode ti) and separable (choriston), substance is form; moreover, the primary substance is form. In my view, that form is substance in Z3 serves more as a plan or outline needed to prove in the following than as a definite conclusion. This article also points out that tode ti in Z8, 1033b21 refers to the individual but not the form. Homdnuma in Z9 cannot be understood as "sharing the same name but with different meaning," but, rather, simply as "having the same name." In his new book Being and Substance: A Study of Aristotle's Metaphysics Z1-9, Nie Minli, taking a holistic perspective, argues that the primary substance--that is, the individual in Categories--is identical to form, which is the primary substance in Metaphysics Z, and that Z3 has finished arguing what the real candidate of substance is and the inserted Z7-9 texts are the "core and key" of the entire book. In spite of his excellent scholarship and masterful interpretation of Metaphysics Z4-6, Z7, Categories 1-5 and Physics A, Nie offers insufficient textual support for his interpretation of the primary substance in Metaphysics Z and the content of Z3. Although substance is the subject (hypokeimenon) and a "this" (tode ti) in Categories, it is the ultimate subject (hypokeimenon eschaton) and a "this" (tode ti) and separable (choriston) in Metaphysics. As the ultimate subject, substance is form and matter but not the individual. As a "this" (tode ti) and separable (choriston), substance is form; moreover, the primary substance is form. In my view, that form is substance in Z3 serves more as a plan or outline needed to prove in the following than as a definite conclusion. This article also points out that tode ti in Z8, 1033b21 refers to the individual but not the form. Homdnuma in Z9 cannot be understood as "sharing the same name but with different meaning," but, rather, simply as "having the same name."
作者 Lǚ Chunshan
机构地区 School of Philosophy
出处 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2012年第4期662-681,共20页 中国哲学前沿(英文版)
关键词 ultimate subject (hypokeimenon eschaton) a this (tode ti) substance(ousia) form and matter ultimate subject (hypokeimenon eschaton), a this (tode ti), substance(ousia), form and matter
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ackrill, John Lloyd. 1963. Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes. London: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Barnes, Jonathan. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 3Bonitz, Hermann. 1991. Aristoteles' Metaphysik, Zweiter Halbband: Bucher VII (Z)-XIV (N) (Aristotle's Metaphysics, Sencond Half Volume VII (Z)-XIV (N)). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • 4Burnyeat, Myles. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh: Mathesis.
  • 5Frede, Michael, and GUnther Patzig. 1988. Aristoteles, Metaphysik Z (Aristotle, Metaphysics 2), 2 vo1s. Munich: C.H. Beck.
  • 6Gemoll, Wilhelm, and Karl Vretska. 2006. Griechisch-Deutsches Schul- und Handworterbuch (Greek-German Student and Concise Dictionary). Munich: Oldenbourg.
  • 7Gill, Mary Louise. 2005. "Aristotle's Metaphysics Reconsidered." Journal of the History of Philosophy 43.3: 223-51.
  • 8Halper, Edward C. 1989. One and Many in Aristotle s Metaphysics: The Central Books. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
  • 9Hardie, R.P., and R.K. Gaye, trans. 1984. Physics, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 10Jaeger, Werner Wilhelm. 1957. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部