期刊文献+

卡维地洛治疗慢性充血性心衰临床疗效及安全性研究 被引量:12

卡维地洛治疗慢性充血性心衰临床疗效及安全性研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨卡维地洛用于慢性充血性心衰治疗的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取治疗的慢性充血性心衰患者102例,随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组给予常规抗心衰治疗,观察组加用卡维地洛进行治疗,比较疗效。结果观察组有效率为96.08%,对照组有效率为82.35%,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。观察组LVE(F45.43±3.21)%,LVEDD(50.17±2.96)mm,LVESD(41.52±3.31)mm,对照组LVE(F38.86±3.54)%,LVEDD(60.36±3.21)mm,LVESD(51.03±3.22)mm。观察组LVEF明显高于对照组,LVEDD和LVESD明显低于对照组(P<0.05),两组不良反应发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论卡维地洛用于慢性充血性心衰的临床治疗,安全有效,可明显改善心功能。 Objective To investigate the effects and safety of carvedilol for chronic congestive heart failure therapy. Methods 102 cases of chronic congestive heart failure in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group was given routine anti heart failure treatment, the observation group combined with carvedilol. Effects and satety were compared. Results. The efficency of the observation group was 96.08%, while the control group was 82.35%, P〈0.05, the difference was significant. LVEF of the observation group was (45.43±3.21)%,LVEDD was (50.17±2.96)mm,LVESD was(41.52±3.31 )ram; LVEF of the control group was(38.86±3.54)%,LVEDD was (60.36±3.21)mm,LVESD was(51.03±3.22)mm. LVEF of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, LVEDD and LVESD were significantly lower than those of the control group(P〈0.05), the incidence of adverse reactions of two group was no significant difference(P〉0.05). Conclusion It was safety and effective for Carvedilol in chronic congestive heart failure clinical treatment. Carvedilol can improve the heart function Obviously.
作者 毛志勇
出处 《当代医学》 2012年第36期126-127,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 卡维地洛 慢性充血性心衰 安全性 Carvedilol Chronic congestive heart failure Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1李勇,诸骏仁.β受体阻滞剂治疗慢性心力衰竭——COMET研究的意义[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(5):466-468. 被引量:50
  • 2唐世凡,程龙献,胡蓉.卡维地洛治疗慢性心力衰竭38例疗效分析[J].疑难病杂志,2005,4(2):79-81. 被引量:5
  • 3张月兰,庞雪峰,贺文辉.卡维地洛治疗老年慢性充血性心力衰竭临床疗效评价[J].中国老年学杂志,2006,26(2):267-268. 被引量:8
  • 4Cleland JG, Clark A. Has the survival of the heart failure population changed ? Lessons from trials [J]. Am J Cordial, 1999, 83:1120 - 1190.
  • 5CIBIS - Ⅱ Investigator and Committees. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study Ⅱ (CIBIS - Ⅱ ) : arandomized trial [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353: 9-13.
  • 6MERIT - HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolo CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT - HF) [ J]. Lancet, 1999, 353:2001 - 2007.
  • 7Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of earvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. US Carvedilol heart failure study group [ J].. % nglJMed, 2001, 344:1651 - 1658.
  • 8Rename WL, Riegger G, Hildebrandt P, et al. The benefits of early combination treatment of carvedilol and an ACE - inhibitor in mild heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The carvedilol and ACE - inhibitor remodelling mild heart failure evaluation trial (CARMEN) [J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2004. 18: 57-66.
  • 9Sliwa K, Norton GR, Kone N, et al. Impact of initiating carvedilol before angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor therapy on cardiac function in newly diagnosed heart failure [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004, 44:1825 - 1830.
  • 10Willenheimer R, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Silke B, et al. Effect on survival and hospitalization of initiating treatment for chronic heart failure with bisoprolol followed by enalapril, as compared with the opposite sequence: results of the randomized Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) Ⅲ [J]. Circulation, 2005, 112: 2426-2435.

共引文献57

同被引文献56

引证文献12

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部