期刊文献+

沟口公路小流域山洪危险性评价——以四川省凉山州美姑河省道公路为例 被引量:5

Flash flood hazard evaluation for highway at the outlet of small watershed——taking highway along Meigu river in Liangshan district of Sichuan province as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对美姑河沿线10个小流域山洪灾害对省道公路的危险性进行了评价,得出了山洪高危险性、中危险性和低危险性小流域的分布图件,山洪高危险性和中危险性小流域沟口处的公路路段为汛期高危险路段。利用最新获取的SRTM-DEM数据,基于GIS空间分析技术,提取了美姑河流域及10个子流域的典型地貌参数,综合考虑提取的地貌量化参数与小流域山洪危险性的关系,分级量化了小流域山洪对沟口公路的危险性大小。通过对流域地貌参数的分析,得出流域南北向伸展的狭长外形受区域构造和断层控制,美姑河流域新构造运动活跃,处于侵蚀循环的活跃阶段,与美姑河流域水土流失、泥石流等山地灾害发育的实际情况吻合。 The flash flood hazard of highway at outlet of ten small watershed channels along Meigu River was evaluated. The high, medium and low hazard distribution map of flash flood for small watersheds was put forward. The sections of highway at the outlet of small watersheds with high and medium flash flood hazard are of high danger for flood season. Using the latest SRTM-DEM data, based on the GIS spatial analysis technology, the quantitative parameters of watershed geomorphology for Meigu River basin and its ten subbasins was extracted. Comprehensively considering the relationship between the quantitative parameters of geomorphology and flash flood hazard for subbasin, the hazard degree of outlet sections of highway for the subbasins was quantified and classified. Through analysis of river basin geomorphology parameters, the results show that the long and narrow, north to south stretched shape of Meigu River basin is controlled by regional tectonic and faults. And the Meigu River basin is in the state of active new tectonic movement and in juvenility stage of erosion cycle, which is consistent with the actual mass wasting and debris flow development situation of Meigu River basin.
出处 《中国地质灾害与防治学报》 CSCD 2012年第4期31-39,共9页 The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41071017) 西部交通建设科技项目(2009318221035)
关键词 公路工程 危险性评价 地貌量测分析 小流域 山洪 美姑河流域 highway engineering hazard evaluation morphometric analysis small watershed flash flood Meigu River basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1杨三强,郝培文,万战胜.G217天山公路典型泥石流沟危险性评价研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(3):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 2刘海松,范敏,倪万魁,张亮.灰色关联度法在公路地质灾害危险性评价中的应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2005,32(3):32-34. 被引量:27
  • 3阳岳龙,何文勇,林剑.贵州省三贵高速公路地质灾害危险度评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(4):71-76. 被引量:4
  • 4Youssef A M, Pradhan B, Hassan A M. Flash flood risk estimation along the St. katherine road, southern sinai, egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery [ J ]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 62 ( 3 ) : 611 - 623.
  • 5张会平,杨农,张岳桥,孟晖.岷江水系流域地貌特征及其构造指示意义[J].第四纪研究,2006,26(1):126-135. 被引量:121
  • 6Abdel-Lattif A, Sherief Y. Morphometric analysis and flash floods of wadi sudr and wadi wardan, gulf of suez,egypt: using digital elevation model [ J ]. Arab J Geosci,2010, DOI 10. 1007/s12517 -010 -0156 -8.
  • 7Bali R, Agarwal K K, Nawaz Ali S, et al. Drainage morphometry of himalayan glacio-fluvial basin, india : hydrologic and neotectonic implications [ J ]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, DOI 10. 1007/ s12665 -011 - 1324 - 1.
  • 8Sreedevi P D, Owais S, Khan H H, et al. Morphometric Analysis of a Watershed of South India Using SRTM Data and GIS[ J ]. Journal Geological Society of India, 2009, 73:543 -552.
  • 9Magesh N S, Chandrasekar N, et al. Morphometric evaluation of papanasam and manimuthar watersheds, parts of western ghats, tirunelveli district, tamil nadu, india-a GIS approach[ J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 64(2) :373 -381.
  • 10四川I美姑河水电开发有限公司.流域概况[z].http://www.meiguhe.corn/Project.asp.2012-2-1.

二级参考文献70

共引文献171

同被引文献64

引证文献5

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部