期刊文献+

基层军官人格、责任感与工作绩效的关系分析

Analyzing the correlation of army officers′ personality, responsibility and work performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析基层军官的工作绩效对于部队基层的管理具有重要意义。基层军官的人格和责任感是影响工作绩效的两个心理特质,通过调查研究,搞清楚二者之间的关系,对于运用基层军官的人格和责任感来预测其工作绩效具有重要意义。采用《艾森克个性问卷(简称EPQ)》《管理者责任心问卷》《工作绩效问卷》等测量工具对部队基层军官进行整群抽样调查,然后进行相关和回归统计分析。相关分析结果表明,责任感及各维度与EPQ各分量表呈现不同程度的相关(P<0.01);责任感及各维度与工作绩效及各维度都呈现不同程度的正相关(P<0.01)。基层军官人格的不同维度对其责任感有不同的影响,责任感的高低影响工作绩效的高低。 The analysis on the officersI work performance is important for the management of army. Personality and responsibility are two key psychological traits influencing officers; work performance. It is essential to understand the relationship between these two traits to predict army officersI work performance. A Cluster sampling survey has been given to the army officers by using Eysenck Person- ality Questionnaire (EPQ), Management Responsibility Questionnaire and Work Performance Ques- tionnaire~ then, the correlation and regression analysis on the data has been made. The correlation a- nalysis demonstrates that responsibility and its dimensions are correlated with the subscale of EPQ(P 〈0.01); moreover, responsibility and its dimensions are positively correlated with work performance and its dimensions(P〈0.01). Different dimensions of officers personality have different influences on their responsibilities, which in turn has an influence on their work performance.
出处 《海军工程大学学报(综合版)》 2012年第4期69-72,共4页 Journal of Naval University of Engineering(Comprehensive Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金军事学项目(10GJ173-34)
关键词 基层军官 人格 责任感 工作绩效 army officers personality responsibility l work performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1张雨青,林薇,陈仲庚.家长对子女人格特点的自由描述──中国儿童样本对“大五”人格结构的验证[J].心理学报,1995,27(3):281-287. 被引量:24
  • 2Castro, S L. Date analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients, rwg(j), hierarchical linear modeling, within-and- between- analysis, and random group resampling.The Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13:69-93.
  • 3Judge, T A , & Bono, J E. Five - factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(5) :751 - 765.
  • 4Hurtz, G M , & Donovan, J J. Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(6) :869- 879.
  • 5Conway, J M. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84(1) :3- 13.
  • 6Barrick, M R, & Mount, M K. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta - analysis Personnel Psychology, 1991,44 : 1 - 26.
  • 7Salgado, J F. The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997,82 : 30 - 43.
  • 8Hofstede, G. Culture, s Consequences: International Difference in Work - related Values. Sage Publications,Beverly Hills, London New Delhi, 1980.
  • 9Beaty, J C , Cleveland, J N , & Murphy, K R. The Relation Between Personality and Contextual Performance in "Strong" Versus "Weak" Situations. Human Performance,2001,14:125 - 148.
  • 10Barrick, M R , Mount, M K , & Strauss, J P. Conscientiousness and Performance of Sales Representatives: Tests of the Mediating Effects of Goal Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993,78 : 715 - 722.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部